Literature DB >> 26756140

Temporal-Bone Measurements of the Maximum Equivalent Pressure Output and Maximum Stable Gain of a Light-Driven Hearing System That Mechanically Stimulates the Umbo.

Sunil Puria1, Peter Luke Santa Maria, Rodney Perkins.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: That maximum equivalent pressure output (MEPO) and maximum stable gain (MSG) measurements demonstrate high output and high gain margins in a light-driven hearing system (Earlens).
BACKGROUND: The nonsurgical Earlens consists of a light-activated balanced-armature transducer placed on the tympanic membrane (Lens) to drive the middle ear through direct umbo contact. The Lens is driven and powered by encoded pulses of light. In comparison to conventional hearing aids, the Earlens is designed to provide higher levels of output over a broader frequency range, with a significantly higher MSG. MEPO provides an important fitting guideline.
METHODS: Four fresh human cadaveric temporal bones were used to measure MEPO directly. To calculate MEPO and MSG, we measured the pressure close to the eardrum and the stapes velocity, for sound drive and light drive using the Earlens.
RESULTS: The baseline sound-driven measurements are consistent with previous reports. The average MEPO (n = 4) varies from 116 to 128 dB SPL in the 0.7 to 10 kHz range, with the peak occurring at 7.6 kHz. From 0.1 to 0.7 kHz, it varies from 83 to 121 dB SPL. For the average MSG, a broad minimum of about 10 dB occurs in the 1 to 4 kHz range, above which it rises as high as 42 dB at 7.6 kHz. From 0.2 to 1 kHz, the MSG decreases linearly from approximately 40 dB to 10 dB.
CONCLUSION: With high output and high gain margins, the Earlens may offer broader-spectrum amplification for treatment of mild-to-severe hearing impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756140      PMCID: PMC4712733          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  12 in total

1.  Factors contributing to bone conduction: the outer ear.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Timothy Wild; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

4.  An objective procedure for evaluation of adaptive antifeedback algorithms in hearing aids.

Authors:  Daniel J Freed; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The discordant eardrum.

Authors:  Jonathan P Fay; Sunil Puria; Charles R Steele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Malleus vibration mode changes with frequency.

Authors:  W F Decraemer; S M Khanna; W R Funnell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The radiation impedance of the external ear of cat: measurements and applications.

Authors:  J J Rosowski; L H Carney; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Tympanic-membrane vibrations in human cadaver ears studied by time-averaged holography.

Authors:  J Tonndorf; S M Khanna
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"?

Authors:  M C Killion
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  R Aibara; J T Welsh; S Puria; R L Goode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid.

Authors:  Morteza Khaleghi; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Noah H Silbert; Katherine Sternasty; De Wet Swanepoel; Lisa L Hunter; David R Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.