Literature DB >> 22042915

Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.

Joshua M Tybur1, Steven W Gangestad.   

Abstract

Mate preferences may operate in part to mitigate the threats posed by infectious disease. In this paper, we outline various ways in which preferring healthy mates can offer direct benefits in terms of pathogen avoidance and indirect benefits in terms of heritable immunity to offspring, as well as the costs that may constrain mate preferences for health. We then pay special attention to empirical work on mate preferences in humans given the depth and breadth of research on human mating. We review this literature and comment on the degree to which human mate preferences may reflect preferences for health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22042915      PMCID: PMC3189358          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  74 in total

1.  Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease.

Authors:  Val Curtis; Robert Aunger; Tamer Rabie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does.

Authors:  Robert Brooks; Isabel M Scott; Alexei A Maklakov; Michael M Kasumovic; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-01

4.  New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study with 58 Southern Brazilian students.

Authors:  Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos; Juliano Augusto Schinemann; Juarez Gabardo; Maria da Graça Bicalho
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high.

Authors:  B C Jones; A C Little; L Boothroyd; L M Debruine; D R Feinberg; M J Law Smith; R E Cornwell; F R Moore; D I Perrett
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  The human brain is a detector of chemosensorily transmitted HLA-class I-similarity in same- and opposite-sex relations.

Authors:  Bettina M Pause; Kerstin Krauel; Claudia Schrader; Bernfried Sojka; Eckhard Westphal; Wolfgang Müller-Ruchholtz; Roman Ferstl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Signaling health versus parasites.

Authors:  Thomas Getty
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Is the peacock's train an honest signal of genetic quality at the major histocompatibility complex?

Authors:  M L Hale; M H Verduijn; A P Møller; K Wolff; M Petrie
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins; Christine E Garver-Apgar; P Niels Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The sociality-health-fitness nexus: synthesis, conclusions and future directions.

Authors:  Charles L Nunn; Meggan E Craft; Thomas R Gillespie; Mark Schaller; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Evolutionary medicine: its scope, interest and potential.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Proactive strategies to avoid infectious disease.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Trevor I Case; Megan J Oaten
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel.

Authors:  Isabel M Scott; Andrew P Clark; Steven C Josephson; Adam H Boyette; Innes C Cuthill; Ruby L Fried; Mhairi A Gibson; Barry S Hewlett; Mark Jamieson; William Jankowiak; P Lynne Honey; Zejun Huang; Melissa A Liebert; Benjamin G Purzycki; John H Shaver; J Josh Snodgrass; Richard Sosis; Lawrence S Sugiyama; Viren Swami; Douglas W Yu; Yangke Zhao; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic factors that increase male facial masculinity decrease facial attractiveness of female relatives.

Authors:  Anthony J Lee; Dorian G Mitchem; Margaret J Wright; Nicholas G Martin; Matthew C Keller; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-30

6.  Male Facial Appearance and Offspring Mortality in Two Traditional Societies.

Authors:  Lynda G Boothroyd; Alan W Gray; Thomas N Headland; Ray T Uehara; David Waynforth; D Michael Burt; Nicholas Pound
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?

Authors:  Toneya L McIntosh; Anthony J Lee; Morgan J Sidari; Rebecca E Stower; James M Sherlock; Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The relationship between health and mating success in humans.

Authors:  Yong Zhi Foo; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Simulating the evolution of the human family: cooperative breeding increases in harsh environments.

Authors:  Paul E Smaldino; Lesley Newson; Jeffrey C Schank; Peter J Richerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Domestic violence shapes Colombian women's partner choices.

Authors:  Martha Lucia Borras-Guevara; Carlota Batres; David I Perrett
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.