Literature DB >> 22714804

Genetic variation in the odorant receptor OR2J3 is associated with the ability to detect the "grassy" smelling odor, cis-3-hexen-1-ol.

Jeremy F McRae1, Joel D Mainland, Sara R Jaeger, Kaylin A Adipietro, Hiroaki Matsunami, Richard D Newcomb.   

Abstract

The ability to detect many odors varies among individuals; however, the contribution of genotype to this variation has been assessed for relatively few compounds. We have identified a genetic basis for the ability to detect the flavor compound cis-3-hexen-1-ol. This compound is typically described as "green grassy" or the smell of "cut grass," with variation in the ability to detect it linked to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a region on human chromosome 6 containing 25 odorant receptor genes. We have sequenced the coding regions of all 25 receptors across an ethnically mixed population of 52 individuals and identified 147 sequence variants. We tested these for association with cis-3-hexen-1-ol detection thresholds and found 3 strongly associated SNPs, including one found in a functional odorant receptor (rs28757581 in OR2J3). In vitro assays of 13 odorant receptors from the region identified 3 receptors that could respond to cis-3-hexen-1-ol, including OR2J3. This gene contained 5 predicted haplotypes across the 52 individuals. We tested all 5 haplotypes in vitro and several amino acid substitutions on their own, such as rs28757581 (T113A). Two amino acid substitutions, T113A and R226Q, impaired the ability of OR2J3 to respond to cis-3-hexen-1-ol, and together these two substitutions effectively abolished the response to the compound. The haplotype of OR2J3 containing both T113A and R226Q explains 26.4% of the variation in cis-3-hexen-1-ol detection in our study cohort. Further research is required to examine whether OR2J3 haplotypes explain variation in perceived flavor experience and the consumption of foods containing cis-3-hexen-1-ol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22714804      PMCID: PMC3408771          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  25 in total

1.  Environmental effects exceed genetic effects on perceived intensity and pleasantness of several odors: a three-population twin study.

Authors:  Antti Knaapila; Hely Tuorila; Karri Silventoinen; Margaret J Wright; Kirsten O Kyvik; Kaisu Keskitalo; Jonathan Hansen; Jaakko Kaprio; Markus Perola
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Activation state of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor modulates mammalian odorant receptor signaling.

Authors:  Yun Rose Li; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  The distribution of the sensitivity to chemical odors in man.

Authors:  K S Brown; C M Maclean; R R Robinette
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 0.553

4.  Effects of (Z)-3-hexenol, a major component of green odor, on anxiety-related behavior of the mouse in an elevated plus-maze test and biogenic amines and their metabolites in the brain.

Authors:  K Tokumo; N Tamura; T Hirai; H Nishio
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype.

Authors:  Kendra I Bell; Beverly J Tepper
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Vegetable Intake in College-Aged Adults Is Explained by Oral Sensory Phenotypes and TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Andrew C Davidson; Judith R Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Aroma extract dilution analysis of cv. Meeker (Rubus idaeus L.) red raspberries from Oregon and Washington.

Authors:  Keith Klesk; Michael Qian; Robert R Martin
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 5.279

9.  Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits.

Authors:  Nicholas Eriksson; J Michael Macpherson; Joyce Y Tung; Lawrence S Hon; Brian Naughton; Serge Saxonov; Linda Avey; Anne Wojcicki; Itsik Pe'er; Joanna Mountain
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genetic elucidation of human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid.

Authors:  Idan Menashe; Tatjana Abaffy; Yehudit Hasin; Sivan Goshen; Vered Yahalom; Charles W Luetje; Doron Lancet
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Mammalian odorant receptors: functional evolution and variation.

Authors:  Yue Jiang; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  The essence of appetite: does olfactory receptor variation play a role?

Authors:  Erin E Connor; Yang Zhou; George E Liu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Individual olfactory perception reveals meaningful nonolfactory genetic information.

Authors:  Lavi Secundo; Kobi Snitz; Kineret Weissler; Liron Pinchover; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Ron Loewenthal; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Idan Frumin; Dana Bar-Zvi; Sagit Shushan; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception.

Authors:  C Trimmer; A Keller; N R Murphy; L L Snyder; J R Willer; M H Nagai; N Katsanis; L B Vosshall; H Matsunami; J D Mainland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Real-time In Vitro Monitoring of Odorant Receptor Activation by an Odorant in the Vapor Phase.

Authors:  Claire A de March; Yosuke Fukutani; Aashutosh Vihani; Hitoshi Kida; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Chromosome 17 Missing Proteins: Recent Progress and Future Directions as Part of the neXt-MP50 Challenge.

Authors:  Omer Siddiqui; Hongjiu Zhang; Yuanfang Guan; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  High-throughput analysis of mammalian olfactory receptors: measurement of receptor activation via luciferase activity.

Authors:  Casey Trimmer; Lindsey L Snyder; Joel D Mainland
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Genome-wide association analysis on five isolated populations identifies variants of the HLA-DOA gene associated with white wine liking.

Authors:  Nicola Pirastu; Maarten Kooyman; Michela Traglia; Antonietta Robino; Sara M Willems; Giorgio Pistis; Najaf Amin; Cinzia Sala; Lennart C Karssen; Cornelia M van Duijn; Daniela Toniolo; Paolo Gasparini
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Evolution of Yin and Yang isoforms of a chromatin remodeling subunit precedes the creation of two genes.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Lijiang Long; Yuehui Zhao; Lewis Stevens; Irene Felipe; Javier Munoz; Ronald E Ellis; Patrick T McGrath
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Ligand Specificity and Evolution of Mammalian Musk Odor Receptors: Effect of Single Receptor Deletion on Odor Detection.

Authors:  Narumi Sato-Akuhara; Nao Horio; Aya Kato-Namba; Keiichi Yoshikawa; Yoshihito Niimura; Sayoko Ihara; Mika Shirasu; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.