Literature DB >> 15717996

Utilizing prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer.

Deepa S Subramaniam1, Claudine Isaacs.   

Abstract

In order to make optimal treatment recommendations for patients with early-stage breast cancer, it is essential to accurately determine the patient's underlying risk of disease recurrence and choose a therapy to which the individual is most likely to respond. Lymph node status, tumor size, histopathologic features including tumor type and grade, and hormone receptor status are well-accepted prognostic factors related to breast cancer. In addition, hormone receptor status is a very strong predictor of response to hormonal therapy. However, our currently accepted prognostic and predictive factors fall short and there is a critical need to more accurately identify those most likely to require or benefit from particular therapies. Attention has therefore focused on the determination of novel prognostic and predictive factors. The most promising new factor is the level of urokinase plasminogen activator and its inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor. Other putative factors include proliferative rate, the presence of lymphatic or vascular invasion, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2/neu or erbB-2) positivity, the presence of micrometastases in lymph nodes or bone marrow, and gene expression profile by microarray analysis, and by RNA-based methodology. Data regarding potential new prognostic factors are constantly emerging. These studies are frequently challenging to interpret as they are often retrospective, based on relatively small numbers of patients, include a mix of treated and untreated women, and often do not control for other known prognostic factors. Therefore, new data must be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15717996     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-005-0022-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  54 in total

1.  Redefining prognosis in node-negative breast cancer: can sentinel lymph node biopsy raise the threshold for systemic adjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Hiram S Cody; Patrick I Borgen; Lee K Tan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas.

Authors:  M F Press; L Bernstein; P A Thomas; L F Meisner; J Y Zhou; Y Ma; G Hung; R A Robinson; C Harris; A El-Naggar; D J Slamon; R N Phillips; J S Ross; S R Wolman; K J Flom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Clinical relevance of the urokinase-type and tissue-type plasminogen activators and of their type 1 inhibitor in breast cancer.

Authors:  F Jänicke; M Schmitt; H Graeff
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 4.  Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers.

Authors:  D F Hayes; R C Bast; C E Desch; H Fritsche; N E Kemeny; J M Jessup; G Y Locker; J S Macdonald; R G Mennel; L Norton; P Ravdin; S Taube; R J Winn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The prognostic value of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  R Lauria; F Perrone; C Carlomagno; M De Laurentiis; A Morabito; C Gallo; E Varriale; G Pettinato; L Panico; G Petrella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  M J Ellis; A Coop; B Singh; L Mauriac; A Llombert-Cussac; F Jänicke; W R Miller; D B Evans; M Dugan; C Brady; E Quebe-Fehling; M Borgs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Wiedswang; E Borgen; R Kåresen; G Kvalheim; J M Nesland; H Qvist; E Schlichting; T Sauer; J Janbu; T Harbitz; B Naume
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P P Rosen; S Groshen; D W Kinne; L Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  c-erbB-3 and c-erbB-2 protein expression in node-negative breast carcinoma--an immunocytochemical study.

Authors:  G Gasparini; W J Gullick; S Maluta; P Dalla Palma; O Caffo; E Leonardi; P Boracchi; F Pozza; N R Lemoine; P Bevilacqua
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Occult axillary lymph node metastases are of no prognostic significance in breast cancer.

Authors:  R R Millis; R Springall; A H S Lee; K Ryder; E R C Rytina; I S Fentiman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Molecular biology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miguel Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Systems approaches to molecular cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Shuyi Ma; Cory C Funk; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.970

3.  ER, PgR, HER-2, Ki-67, topoisomerase IIα, and nm23-H1 proteins expression as predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Xi-ru Li; Mei Liu; Yan-jun Zhang; Jian-dong Wang; Yi-qiong Zheng; Jie Li; Bing Ma; Xin Song
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  [Prognostic and predictive factors of invasive breast cancer: update 2009].

Authors:  T Decker; D Hungermann; W Böcker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Signal transducers and activators of transcription-3 up-regulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 expression and decreases invasiveness of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien; Hesham M Amin; Neil Chiu; Winson Wong; Christine Frantz; Brian Chiu; John R Mackey; Raymond Lai
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  IQGAP1 protein binds human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and modulates trastuzumab resistance.

Authors:  Colin D White; Zhigang Li; Deborah A Dillon; David B Sacks
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Genistein affects HER2 protein concentration, activation, and promoter regulation in BT-474 human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Mary S Sakla; Nader S Shenouda; Pete J Ansell; Ruth S Macdonald; Dennis B Lubahn
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  The potential biomarkers in predicting pathologic response of breast cancer to three different chemotherapy regimens: a case control study.

Authors:  Linbo Wang; Zhinong Jiang; Meihua Sui; Jianguo Shen; Chaoyang Xu; Weimin Fan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Molecular alterations in key-regulator genes among patients with T4 breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Bruno Massidda; Mariacristina Sini; Mario Budroni; Francesco Atzori; Mariacristina Deidda; Valeria Pusceddu; Mariateresa Perra; Paola Sirigu; Antonio Cossu; Grazia Palomba; Mariateresa Ionta; Giuseppe Palmieri
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Molecular profiling of breast cancer cell lines defines relevant tumor models and provides a resource for cancer gene discovery.

Authors:  Jessica Kao; Keyan Salari; Melanie Bocanegra; Yoon-La Choi; Luc Girard; Jeet Gandhi; Kevin A Kwei; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Pei Wang; Adi F Gazdar; John D Minna; Jonathan R Pollack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.