Literature DB >> 21189224

Systems approaches to molecular cancer diagnostics.

Shuyi Ma1, Cory C Funk, Nathan D Price.   

Abstract

The search for improved molecular cancer diagnostics is a challenge for which systems approaches show great promise. As is becoming increasingly clear, cancer is a perpetually-evolving, highly multi-factorial disease. With next generation sequencing providing an ever-increasing amount of high-throughput data, the need for analytical tools that can provide meaningful context is critical. Systems approaches have demonstrated an ability to separate meaningful signal from noise that arises from population heterogeneity, heterogeneity within and across tumors, and multiple sources of technical variation when sufficient sample sizes are obtained and standardized measurement technologies are used. The ability to develop clinically useful molecular cancer diagnostics will be predicated on advancements on two major fronts: 1) more comprehensive and accurate measurements of multiple endpoints, and 2) more sophisticated analytical tools that synthesize high-throughput data into meaningful reflections of cellular states. To this end, systems approaches that have integrated transcriptomic data onto biomolecular networks have shown promise in their ability to classify tumor subtypes, predict clinical progression, and inform treatment options. Ultimately, the success of systems approaches will be measured by their ability to develop molecular cancer diagnostics through distilling complex, systems-wide information into actionable information in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21189224      PMCID: PMC3155470     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Discov Med        ISSN: 1539-6509            Impact factor:   2.970


  98 in total

1.  Systems biology and new technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine.

Authors:  Leroy Hood; James R Heath; Michael E Phelps; Biaoyang Lin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Stage-specific changes in SR splicing factors and alternative splicing in mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E Stickeler; F Kittrell; D Medina; S M Berget
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-06-17       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  A need for basic research on fluid-based early detection biomarkers.

Authors:  Katherine J Martin; Marcia V Fournier; G Prem Veer Reddy; Arthur B Pardee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer management.

Authors:  C K Osborne
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Identification of alternative splicing markers for breast cancer.

Authors:  Julian P Venables; Roscoe Klinck; Anne Bramard; Lyna Inkel; Geneviève Dufresne-Martin; ChuShin Koh; Julien Gervais-Bird; Elvy Lapointe; Ulrike Froehlich; Mathieu Durand; Daniel Gendron; Jean-Philippe Brosseau; Philippe Thibault; Jean-Francois Lucier; Karine Tremblay; Panagiotis Prinos; Raymund J Wellinger; Benoit Chabot; Claudine Rancourt; Sherif Abou Elela
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  The cancer genome.

Authors:  Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Edinburgh human metabolic network reconstruction and its functional analysis.

Authors:  Hongwu Ma; Anatoly Sorokin; Alexander Mazein; Alex Selkov; Evgeni Selkov; Oleg Demin; Igor Goryanin
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  2 in total

1.  Has discovery-based cancer research been a bust?

Authors:  R J Epstein
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Measuring the effect of inter-study variability on estimating prediction error.

Authors:  Shuyi Ma; Jaeyun Sung; Andrew T Magis; Yuliang Wang; Donald Geman; Nathan D Price
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.