Literature DB >> 11559718

Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial.

M J Ellis1, A Coop, B Singh, L Mauriac, A Llombert-Cussac, F Jänicke, W R Miller, D B Evans, M Dugan, C Brady, E Quebe-Fehling, M Borgs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Expression of ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 (epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2/neu) in breast cancer may cause tamoxifen resistance, but not all studies concur. Additionally, the relationship between ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 expression and response to selective aromatase inhibitors is unknown. A neoadjuvant study for primary breast cancer that randomized treatment between letrozole and tamoxifen provided a context within which these issues could be addressed prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with estrogen- and/or progesterone receptor-positive (ER+ and/or PgR+) primary breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery were randomly assigned to 4 months of neoadjuvant letrozole 2.5 mg daily or tamoxifen 20 mg daily in a double-blinded study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ER and PgR was conducted on pretreatment biopsies and assessed by the Allred score. ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 IHC were assessed by intensity and completeness of membranous staining according to published criteria.
RESULTS: For study biopsy-confirmed ER+ and/or PgR+ cases that received letrozole, 60% responded and 48% underwent successful breast-conserving surgery. The response to tamoxifen was inferior (41%, P =.004), and fewer patients underwent breast conservation (36%, P =.036). Differences in response rates between letrozole and tamoxifen were most marked for tumors that were positive for ErbB-1 and/or ErbB-2 and ER (88% v 21%, P =.0004).
CONCLUSION: ER+, ErbB-1+, and/or ErbB-2+ primary breast cancer responded well to letrozole, but responses to tamoxifen were infrequent. This suggests that ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 signaling through ER is ligand-dependent and that the growth-promoting effects of these receptor tyrosine kinases on ER+ breast cancer can be inhibited by potent estrogen deprivation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11559718     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.18.3808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  159 in total

Review 1.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Anti-HER2 vaccines: new prospects for breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Maha Zohra Ladjemi; William Jacot; Thierry Chardès; André Pèlegrin; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 6.968

3.  Hyperactivation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase promotes escape from hormone dependence in estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd W Miller; Bryan T Hennessy; Ana M González-Angulo; Emily M Fox; Gordon B Mills; Heidi Chen; Catherine Higham; Carlos García-Echeverría; Yu Shyr; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Sunil Verma; Mark Clemons; Barbara Fitzgerald; Orit Freedman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Assessment of response to endocrine therapy using FDG PET/CT in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nina Mortazavi-Jehanno; Anne-Laure Giraudet; Laurence Champion; Florence Lerebours; Elise Le Stanc; Veronique Edeline; Olivier Madar; Dominique Bellet; Alain Paul Pecking; Jean-Louis Alberini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Mechanisms of resistance to hormonal treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Eroles; A Bosch; B Bermejo; A Lluch
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Upregulation of mucin4 in ER-positive/HER2-overexpressing breast cancer xenografts with acquired resistance to endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Albert C Chen; Ilenia Migliaccio; Mothaffar Rimawi; Sara Lopez-Tarruella; Chad J Creighton; Suleiman Massarweh; Catherine Huang; Yen-Chao Wang; Surinder K Batra; M Carolina Gutierrez; C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Population and target considerations for triple-negative breast cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Terry Hyslop; Yvonne Michael; Tiffany Avery; Hallgeir Rui
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

10.  Trends in Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Use and Impact on Rates of Breast Conservation in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Data Base Study.

Authors:  Akiko Chiba; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Heins; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth B Habermann; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.