PURPOSE: This study was performed to disclose the clinical impact of isolated tumor cell (ITC) detection in bone marrow (BM) in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BM aspirates were collected from 817 patients at primary surgery. Tumor cells in BM were detected by immunocytochemistry using anticytokeratin antibodies (AE1/AE3). Analyses of the primary tumor included histologic grading, vascular invasion, and immunohistochemical detection of c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, p53, and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR) expression. These analyses were compared with clinical outcome. The median follow-up was 49 months. RESULTS: ITC were detected in 13.2% of the patients. The detection rate rose with increasing tumor size (P =.011) and lymph node involvement (P <.001). Systemic relapse and death from breast cancer occurred in 31.7% and 26.9% of the BM-positive patients versus 13.7% and 10.9% of BM-negative patients, respectively (P <.001). Analyzing node-positive and node-negative patients separately, ITC positivity was associated with poor prognosis in the node-positive group and in node-negative patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (T1N0). In multivariate analysis, ITC in BM was an independent prognostic factor together with node, tumor, and ER/PgR status, histologic grade, and vascular invasion. In separate analysis of the T1N0 patients, histologic grade was independently associated with both distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), ITC detection was associated with BCSS, and vascular invasion was associated with DDFS. CONCLUSION: ITC in BM is an independent predictor of DDFS and BCSS. An unfavorable prognosis was observed for node-positive patients and for node-negative patients not receiving systemic therapy. A combination of several independent prognostic factors can classify subgroups of patients into excellent and high-risk prognosis groups.
PURPOSE: This study was performed to disclose the clinical impact of isolated tumor cell (ITC) detection in bone marrow (BM) in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BM aspirates were collected from 817 patients at primary surgery. Tumor cells in BM were detected by immunocytochemistry using anticytokeratin antibodies (AE1/AE3). Analyses of the primary tumor included histologic grading, vascular invasion, and immunohistochemical detection of c-erbB-2, cathepsin D, p53, and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR) expression. These analyses were compared with clinical outcome. The median follow-up was 49 months. RESULTS: ITC were detected in 13.2% of the patients. The detection rate rose with increasing tumor size (P =.011) and lymph node involvement (P <.001). Systemic relapse and death from breast cancer occurred in 31.7% and 26.9% of the BM-positive patients versus 13.7% and 10.9% of BM-negative patients, respectively (P <.001). Analyzing node-positive and node-negative patients separately, ITC positivity was associated with poor prognosis in the node-positive group and in node-negative patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (T1N0). In multivariate analysis, ITC in BM was an independent prognostic factor together with node, tumor, and ER/PgR status, histologic grade, and vascular invasion. In separate analysis of the T1N0 patients, histologic grade was independently associated with both distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), ITC detection was associated with BCSS, and vascular invasion was associated with DDFS. CONCLUSION: ITC in BM is an independent predictor of DDFS and BCSS. An unfavorable prognosis was observed for node-positive patients and for node-negative patients not receiving systemic therapy. A combination of several independent prognostic factors can classify subgroups of patients into excellent and high-risk prognosis groups.
Authors: Hege G Russnes; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Alexander Krasnitz; Pär Lundin; Bjørn Naume; Therese Sørlie; Elin Borgen; Inga H Rye; Anita Langerød; Suet-Feung Chin; Andrew E Teschendorff; Philip J Stephens; Susanne Månér; Ellen Schlichting; Lars O Baumbusch; Rolf Kåresen; Michael P Stratton; Michael Wigler; Carlos Caldas; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Christian Schindlbeck; Ulrich Andergassen; Simone Hofmann; Julia Jückstock; Udo Jeschke; Harald Sommer; Klaus Friese; Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: A Daskalaki; S Agelaki; M Perraki; S Apostolaki; N Xenidis; E Stathopoulos; E Kontopodis; D Hatzidaki; D Mavroudis; V Georgoulias Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 7.640