Literature DB >> 8229123

Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up.

P P Rosen1, S Groshen, D W Kinne, L Norton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to define prognostically favorable and unfavorable subgroups of node-negative breast carcinoma patients by employing conventional pathologic data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred sixty-seven women with T1N0M0/T2N0M0 breast carcinoma treated consecutively from 1964 through 1970 by modified or radical mastectomy without systemic adjuvant therapy were analyzed at a median follow-up duration of 18 years.
RESULTS: Size and histologic type of the carcinoma were crucial discriminants of prognosis. We defined a prognostically favorable group of 219 patients (29%) with infiltrating duct or lobular carcinoma < or = 1.0 cm in diameter or special tumor types < or = 3.0 cm. This group had a relapse-free survival rate of 91% at 10 years and 87% at 20 years. The less favorable group (548 patients, 71%) with infiltrating duct or lobular carcinoma greater than 1.0 cm and special tumor types greater than 3.0 cm had relapse-free survival rates of 73% and 68% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. The frequency of nonmammary malignant neoplasms (NMMN) was similar to that of contralateral carcinoma. Deaths due to NMMN were seven times more frequent than deaths due to contralateral carcinoma.
CONCLUSION: Nearly 30% of these node-negative patients, identified on the basis of tumor size and type, had an extremely favorable prognosis. There is insufficient evidence to warrant the routine use of adjuvant therapy in this group unless new forms of treatment prove to be less toxic and/or more effective in enhancing relapse-free survival. Early detection of NMMN should be an important part of the follow-up of node-negative breast carcinoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8229123     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  42 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: current and new predictors of metastasis.

Authors:  D F Hayes; C Isaacs; V Stearns
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Three dimensional staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  I L Wapnir; D E Wartenberg; R S Greco
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  [Prognostic and predictive factors of invasive breast cancer: update 2009].

Authors:  T Decker; D Hungermann; W Böcker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  Utilizing prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Deepa S Subramaniam; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

5.  Role of the Cdc25A phosphatase in human breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Cangi; B Cukor; P Soung; S Signoretti; G Moreira; M Ranashinge; B Cady; M Pagano; M Loda
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Personalized medicine in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Cho; Jongsu Jeon; Seung Il Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.588

8.  Prediction of outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer: evaluation with prognostic factors and Nottingham prognostic index.

Authors:  Mu-Tai Liu; Wen-Tao Huang; Ai-Yih Wang; Chia-Chun Huang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Tung-Hao Chang; Chu-Pin Pi; Hao-Han Yang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in histologically normal breast epithelium is distinct from loss of heterozygosity or allele imbalance in co-existing carcinomas.

Authors:  Pamela S Larson; Antonio de las Morenas; Sheila R Bennett; L Adrienne Cupples; Carol L Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Small breast lesion classification performance using the normalized axial-shear strain area feature.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Jonathan Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.