Literature DB >> 15710897

Past trials influence perception of ambiguous motion quartets through pattern completion.

L T Maloney1, M F Dal Martello, C Sahm, L Spillmann.   

Abstract

There are many celebrated examples of ambiguous perceptual configurations such as the Necker cube that abruptly and repeatedly "switch" among possible perceptual states. When such ambiguous configurations are presented intermittently, observers tend to see the same perceptual state on successive trials. The outcome of each trial apparently serves to "prime" the outcome of the following. We sought to determine how long the influence of a past trial persists by using ambiguous motion quartets as stimuli. We found large, significant effects of all four most recent trials, but the results were not consistent with any priming model. The results could be explained instead as perceptual completion of two kinds of temporal patterns, repeating and alternating. We conclude that the visual system does not passively remember perceptual state: it analyzes recent perceptual history and attempts to predict what will come next. These predictions can alter what is seen.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15710897      PMCID: PMC549457          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407157102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Effects of similarity on apparent motion and perceptual grouping.

Authors:  T Oyama; M Simizu; J Tozawa
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Melanie Wilke; Alexander Maier; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Scott A Huettel; Peter B Mack; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Nonlinearity in color space measured by apparent motion.

Authors:  S Shioiri; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-08

5.  Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Melanie Wilke; Nikos K Logothetis; David A Leopold
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks.

Authors:  G R Lockhead; M C King
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Perceptual organization in multistable apparent motion.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; S M Anstis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion.

Authors:  P Burt; G Sperling
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The effect of similarity between line segments on the correspondence strength in apparent motion.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  28 in total

1.  Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation.

Authors:  Ming Bo Cai; David M Eagleman; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance.

Authors:  Mark Wexler; Marianne Duyck; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Target selection for visually guided reaching in macaque.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Naomi Takahashi; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Adaptive estimation of three-dimensional structure in the human brain.

Authors:  Tim J Preston; Zoe Kourtzi; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural processes for intentional control of perceptual switching: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Masanori Shimono; Keiichi Kitajo; Tsunehiro Takeda
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Predictions Shape Confidence in Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus.

Authors:  Maxine T Sherman; Anil K Seth; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Learning bundles of stimuli renders stimulus order as a cue, not a confound.

Authors:  Ting Qian; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Multistable binocular feature-integrated percepts are frozen by intermittent presentation.

Authors:  Para Kang; Steven Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Duality in binocular rivalry: distinct sensitivity of percept sequence and percept duration to imbalance between monocular stimuli.

Authors:  Chen Song; Haishan Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.