Literature DB >> 17109109

Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision.

Anna Ma-Wyatt1, Suzanne P McKee.   

Abstract

People make rapid, goal-directed movements to interact with their environment. Because these movements have consequences, it is important to be able to control them with a high level of precision and accuracy. Our hypothesis is that vision guides rapid hand movements, thereby enhancing their accuracy and precision. To test this idea, we asked observers to point to a briefly presented target (110 ms). We measured the impact of visual information on endpoint precision by using a shutter to close off view of the hand 50, 110 and 250 ms into the reach. We found that precision was degraded if the view of the hand was restricted at any time during the reach, despite the fact that the target disappeared long before the reach was completed. We therefore conclude that vision keeps the hand on the planned trajectory. We then investigated the effects of a perturbation of target position during the reach. For these experiments, the target remained visible until the reach was completed. The target position was shifted at 110, 180 or 250 ms into the reach. Early shifts in target position were easily compensated for, but late shifts led to a shift in the mean position of the endpoints; observers pointed to the center of the two locations, as a kind of best bet on the position of the target. Visual information is used to guide the hand throughout a reach and has a significant impact on endpoint precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17109109     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0767-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension.

Authors:  J D Connolly; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How the lack of visuomotor feedback affects even the early stages of goal-directed pointing movements.

Authors:  Bhavin R Sheth; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli.

Authors:  E Komilis; D Pélisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 5.  Fast and slow feedback loops for the visual correction of spatial errors in a pointing task: a reappraisal.

Authors:  J Paillard
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.273

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human.

Authors:  S Kitazawa; T Kohno; T Uka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; G Stelmach; M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of hand termination and accuracy constraint on eye-hand coordination during sequential two-segment movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Heidi Long; Anna Ma-Wyatt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motor abundance contributes to resolving multiple kinematic task constraints.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Freitas; Mark Latash; Katherine Monahan; Gregor Schöner; John Scholz
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.422

5.  A Simple and Accurate onset Detection Method for a Measured Bell-shaped Speed Profile.

Authors:  Lior Botzer; Amir Karniel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  On-line corrections for visuomotor errors.

Authors:  Britne A Shabbott; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The spatial and temporal properties of attentional selectivity for saccades and reaches.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Preeti Verghese; Anna Ma-Wyatt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Activity in ventral premotor cortex is modulated by vision of own hand in action.

Authors:  Luciano Fadiga; Luana Caselli; Laila Craighero; Benno Gesierich; Andriy Oliynyk; Banty Tia; Riccardo Viaro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  The effects of ageing and visual field loss on pointing to visual targets.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Andrew J Anderson; Anna Ma-Wyatt; Mark J Walland; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neural activity in the medial parietal area V6A while grasping with or without visual feedback.

Authors:  Rossella Breveglieri; Annalisa Bosco; Claudio Galletti; Lauretta Passarelli; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.