Literature DB >> 26627250

Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance.

Mark Wexler1, Marianne Duyck2, Pascal Mamassian3.   

Abstract

Studies of perception usually emphasize processes that are largely universal across observers and--except for short-term fluctuations--stationary over time. Here we test the universality and stationarity assumptions with two families of ambiguous visual stimuli. Each stimulus can be perceived in two different ways, parameterized by two opposite directions from a continuous circular variable. A large-sample study showed that almost all observers have preferred directions or biases, with directions lying within 90 degrees of the bias direction nearly always perceived and opposite directions almost never perceived. The biases differ dramatically from one observer to the next, and although nearly every bias direction occurs in the population, the population distributions of the biases are nonuniform, featuring asymmetric peaks in the cardinal directions. The biases for the two families of stimuli are independent and have distinct population distributions. Following external perturbations and spontaneous fluctuations, the biases decay over tens of seconds toward their initial values. Persistent changes in the biases are found on time scales of several minutes to 1 hour. On scales of days to months, the biases undergo a variety of dynamical processes such as drifts, jumps, and oscillations. The global statistics of a majority of these long-term time series are well modeled as random walk processes. The measurable fluctuations of these hitherto unknown degrees of freedom show that the assumptions of universality and stationarity in perception may be unwarranted and that models of perception must include both directly observable variables as well as covert, persistent states.

Keywords:  bias; depth; perception; persistent state; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26627250      PMCID: PMC4672830          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508847112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  43 in total

1.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects.

Authors:  M Wexler; F Panerai; I Lamouret; J Droulez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Melanie Wilke; Alexander Maier; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Hupé; Nava Rubin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Sustained directional biases in motion transparency.

Authors:  Pascal Mamassian; Julian M Wallace
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Sensory memory for ambiguous vision.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Jan Brascamp
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Probing visual motion signals with a priming paradigm.

Authors:  A Pinkus; A Pantle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Extrapolation of motion path in human visual perception.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; S M Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  Predictive cues reduce but do not eliminate intrinsic response bias.

Authors:  Mingjia Hu; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

2.  Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements.

Authors:  C Pelofi; V de Gardelle; P Egré; D Pressnitzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Alina Liberman; Anna Kosovicheva; Kathy Zhang; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

4.  Stable individual signatures in object localization.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Time Order as Psychological Bias.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-03-24

7.  Response Bias Reflects Individual Differences in Sensory Encoding.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01

8.  The dress and individual differences in the perception of surface properties.

Authors:  Christoph Witzel; J Kevin O'Regan; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A different view on the Necker cube-Differences in multistable perception dynamics between Asperger and non-Asperger observers.

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Rike Wörner; Andreas Riedel; Ludger Tebartz van Elst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The perceived stability of scenes: serial dependence in ensemble representations.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Alina Liberman; Wesley Chaney; David Whitney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.