Literature DB >> 25246587

Learning bundles of stimuli renders stimulus order as a cue, not a confound.

Ting Qian1, Richard N Aslin2.   

Abstract

The order in which stimuli are presented in an experiment has long been recognized to influence behavior. Previous accounts have often attributed the effect of stimulus order to the mechanisms with which people process information. We propose that stimulus order influences cognition because it is an important cue for learning the underlying structure of a task environment. In particular, stimulus order can be used to infer a "stimulus bundle"--a sequence of consecutive stimuli that share the same underlying latent cluster. We describe a clustering model that successfully explains the perception of streak shooting in basketball games, along with two other cognitive phenomena, as the outcome of finding the statistically optimal bundle representation. We argue that the perspective of viewing stimulus order as a cue may hold the key to explaining behaviors that seemingly deviate from normative theories of cognition and that in task domains where the assumption of stimulus bundles is intuitively appropriate, it can improve the explanatory power of existing models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246587      PMCID: PMC4210001          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1416109111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning.

Authors:  Noah D Goodman; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Jacob Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-01-02

2.  Sequence effects in the categorization of tones varying in frequency.

Authors:  Neil Stewart; Gordon D A Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  A probabilistic model of theory formation.

Authors:  Charles Kemp; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Sourabh Niyogi; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-11-04

5.  Effect of memory decay on predictions from changing categories.

Authors:  S W Elliott; J R Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction.

Authors:  R Elio; J R Anderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-01

7.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  An approximately Bayesian delta-rule model explains the dynamics of belief updating in a changing environment.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Robert C Wilson; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-05-04

10.  Learning time-varying categories.

Authors:  Daniel J Navarro; Andrew Perfors; Wai Keen Vong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Incremental implicit learning of bundles of statistical patterns.

Authors:  Ting Qian; T Florian Jaeger; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-15

2.  Implied motion language can influence visual spatial memory.

Authors:  David W Vinson; Jan Engelen; Rolf A Zwaan; Teenie Matlock; Rick Dale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  Andrew Saxe; Stephanie Nelli; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Individual differences in learning social and nonsocial network structures.

Authors:  Steven H Tompson; Ari E Kahn; Emily B Falk; Jean M Vettel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A Computational Model of Context-Dependent Encodings During Category Learning.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04

6.  Comparing continual task learning in minds and machines.

Authors:  Timo Flesch; Jan Balaguer; Ronald Dekker; Hamed Nili; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Comparative Analysis of Behavioral Models for Adaptive Learning in Changing Environments.

Authors:  Dimitrije Marković; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Process reveals structure: How a network is traversed mediates expectations about its architecture.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Ari E Kahn; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.