Literature DB >> 21209276

Multistable binocular feature-integrated percepts are frozen by intermittent presentation.

Para Kang1, Steven Shevell.   

Abstract

When two different stimuli are presented continuously to each eye, the percept alternates over time between the left-eye stimulus and right-eye stimulus. The perceptual alternation can be slowed or even stopped, however, if the same stimuli are presented intermittently (D. A. Leopold, M. Wilke, A. Maier, & N. K. Logothetis, 2002; J. Orbach, D. Ehrlich, & H. A. Heath, 1963). A basic question is the nature of the persisting neural representation, which mediates the stabilized percept. Is it a representation for the dominant eye, for the stimulus in one eye or for a feature-integrated percept incorporating features presented separately to each eye? We define a feature-integrated percept as one constructed by the visual system but which never is presented as a stimulus. This was tested using a feature-integrated percept resulting from rivalrous, equiluminant chromatic patterns (S. W. Hong & S. K. Shevell, 2009). Measurements showed that the feature-integrated percept was stabilized by intermittent viewing: when the percept at the end of the initial viewing period was feature-integrated, this same integrated percept was seen on subsequent intermittent presentations. The results showed that the stabilized percept from these intermittent rivalrous patterns was due to a persisting neural representation at or after binocular feature integration, not to a persisting dominant eye or neural representation of a retinal stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21209276      PMCID: PMC3208525          DOI: 10.1167/11.1.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  29 in total

Review 1.  On binocular alternation.

Authors:  D Alais; R P O'Shea; C Mesana-Alais; I G Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Melanie Wilke; Nikos K Logothetis; David A Leopold
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli.

Authors:  Xiangchuan Chen; Sheng He
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Psychophysics: catching the old codger's eye.

Authors:  Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Colin G W Clifford
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: rivalry is biased by perceptual history.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Gina Gruenhage; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Binocular rivalry suppression: insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change.

Authors:  R Blake; R Fox
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations.

Authors:  R R Blake; R Fox; C McIntyre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

9.  What is suppressed during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  R Blake; D H Westendorf; R Overton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance.

Authors:  D I MacLeod; R M Boynton
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Colour misbinding during motion rivalry.

Authors:  Ryan T Maloney; Sarah K Lam; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.