Literature DB >> 26401626

Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation.

Ming Bo Cai, David M Eagleman, Wei Ji Ma.   

Abstract

A repeated stimulus is judged as briefer than a novel one. It has been suggested that this duration illusion is an example of a more general phenomenon-namely that a more expected stimulus is judged as briefer than a less expected one. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated high-level expectation through the probability of a stimulus sequence, through the regularity of the preceding stimuli in a sequence, or through whether a stimulus violates an overlearned sequence. We found that perceived duration is not reduced by these types of expectation. Repetition of stimuli, on the other hand, consistently reduces perceived duration across our experiments. In addition, the effect of stimulus repetition is constrained to the location of the repeated stimulus. Our findings suggest that estimates of subsecond duration are largely the result of low-level sensory processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26401626      PMCID: PMC5833204          DOI: 10.1167/15.13.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  40 in total

1.  Tactile duration compression by vibrotactile adaptation.

Authors:  Junji Watanabe; Tomohiro Amemiya; Shin'ya Nishida; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; James Intriligator; Josée Rivest; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

3.  Timing in the absence of clocks: encoding time in neural network states.

Authors:  Uma R Karmarkar; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time.

Authors:  Hugo Merchant; Deborah L Harrington; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963

9.  Perceived duration of expected and unexpected stimuli.

Authors:  Rolf Ulrich; Judith Nitschke; Thomas Rammsayer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-12-18

Review 10.  Human time perception and its illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  8 in total

1.  The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception.

Authors:  Jordan J Wehrman; John Wearden; Paul Sowman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-12

2.  Interval timing in a hierarchical violation-of-expectation task: Dissociable effects of local and global predictions.

Authors:  Shamini Warda; Azizuddin Khan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Triple dissociation of duration perception regulating mechanisms: Top-down attention is inherent.

Authors:  Yong-Jun Lin; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Regular Is Longer.

Authors:  Kyoshiro Sasaki; Yuki Yamada
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-09-13

5.  The Modulation of Stimulus Familiarity on the Repetition Effect in Duration Judgment.

Authors:  Lina Jia; Can Deng; Lili Wang; Xuelian Zang; Xiaocheng Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-12

6.  The perceived duration of expected events depends on how the expectation is formed.

Authors:  Blake W Saurels; Derek H Arnold; Natasha L Anderson; Ottmar V Lipp; Kielan Yarrow
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Further Evidence That the Effects of Repetition on Subjective Time Depend on Repetition Probability.

Authors:  William J Skylark; Ana I Gheorghiu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-01

8.  Anxiety makes time pass quicker while fear has no effect.

Authors:  Ioannis Sarigiannidis; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst; Jonathan P Roiser; Oliver J Robinson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-12-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.