Literature DB >> 15705069

Gleason grade remains an important prognostic predictor in men diagnosed with prostate cancer while on finasteride therapy.

Brett S Carver1, Michael W Kattan, Peter T Scardino, James A Eastham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate men treated with finasteride for lower urinary tract symptoms, who subsequently were diagnosed with prostate cancer and had a radical prostatectomy (RP) at our institution, to determine if finasteride therapy prevented accurate Gleason grade assignment and prediction of biochemical recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1996 and July 2003, 45 men were identified who had RP and had previously been treated with finasteride for > or = 6 months before the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clinical and pathological information was gathered from a RP database. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, duration of finasteride therapy, biopsy Gleason grade, clinical stage, RP Gleason grade and pathological stage were reviewed. Freedom from recurrence was predicted using validated nomograms before and after RP, and compared against actuarial 5-year freedom from recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The mean duration of finasteride therapy before diagnosis was 23.6 months, the mean serum PSA (doubled to account for finasteride use) 11.02 ng/mL and mean biopsy Gleason score 6. When comparing the biopsy and RP specimen Gleason score, it was downgraded by 1 point in six men, upgraded by 1 point in eight, and upgraded by 2 points in one. The Gleason score was constant in 30 patients. The nomograms predicted freedom from recurrence in 83% and 85%, respectively; the 5-year actuarial freedom from recurrence was 86%.
CONCLUSION: Finasteride does not appear to compromise the assignment of Gleason grade for use in prediction tools before or after RP in men undergoing prostate biopsy or RP. The actuarial 5-year freedom from recurrence was similar to that predicted by the validated nomograms. Gleason grade remains an important prognostic predictor in men treated with finasteride and undergoing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15705069      PMCID: PMC1939940          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05375.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  11 in total

Review 1.  Treatment changes in prostatic hyperplasia and cancer, including androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; D Ramnani; L Cheng
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update.

Authors:  A W Partin; M W Kattan; E N Subong; P C Walsh; K J Wojno; J E Oesterling; P T Scardino; J D Pearson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Does long-term finasteride therapy affect the histologic features of benign prostatic tissue and prostate cancer on needle biopsy? PLESS Study Group. Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study.

Authors:  X J Yang; K Lecksell; K Short; J Gottesman; L Peterson; J Bannow; P F Schellhammer; W P Fitch; G B Hodge; R Parra; S Rouse; J Waldstreicher; J I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Effect of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (combined androgen blockade) on normal prostate and prostatic carcinoma. A randomized study.

Authors:  L Vailancourt; B Ttu; Y Fradet; A Dupont; J Gomez; L Cusan; E R Suburu; P Diamond; B Candas; F Labrie
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Effect of castration, DES, flutamide, and the 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, MK-906, on the growth of the Dunning rat prostatic carcinoma, R-3327.

Authors:  J R Brooks; C Berman; H Nguyen; S Prahalada; R L Primka; G H Rasmusson; E E Slater
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Effect of combination endocrine therapy (LHRH agonist and flutamide) on normal prostate and prostatic adenocarcinoma. A histopathologic and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  B Têtu; J R Srigley; J C Boivin; A Dupont; G Monfette; S Pinault; F Labrie
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Histopathological changes in androgen-deprived localized prostatic cancer. A study in total prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  M Hellström; M Häggman; S Brändstedt; M de la Torre; K Pedersen; I Jarlsfeldt; H Wijkström; C Busch
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Leslie G Ford; Michael M Lieber; R Duane Cespedes; James N Atkins; Scott M Lippman; Susie M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Connie M Szczepanek; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Hatzimouratidis Konstantinos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Gleason grading controversies: what the chemoprevention trials have taught us.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Fred Saad; John Trachtenberg; Alexandre Zlotta
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.