Literature DB >> 9145716

Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update.

A W Partin1, M W Kattan, E N Subong, P C Walsh, K J Wojno, J E Oesterling, P T Scardino, J D Pearson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To combine the clinical data from 3 academic institutions that serve as centers of excellence for the surgical treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer and develop a multi-institutional model combining serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
DESIGN: In this update, we have combined clinical and pathological data for a group of 4133 men treated by several surgeons from 3 major academic urologic centers within the United States. Multinomial log-linear regression was performed for the simultaneous prediction of organ-confined disease, isolated capsular penetration, seminal vesicle involvement, or pelvic lymph node involvement. Bootstrap estimates of the predicted probabilities were used to develop nomograms to predict pathological stage. Additional bootstrap analyses were then obtained to validate the performance of the nomograms. PATIENTS AND SETTINGS: A total of 4133 men who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer at The Johns Hopkins Hospital (n=3116), Baylor College of Medicine (n=782), and the University of Michigan School of Medicine (n=235) were enrolled into this study. None of the patients had received preoperative hormonal or radiation therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Simultaneous prediction of organ-confined disease, isolated capsular penetration, seminal vesicle involvement, or pelvic lymph node involvement using updated nomograms.
RESULTS: Prostate-specific antigen level, TNM clinical stage, and Gleason score contributed significantly to the prediction of pathological stage (P<.001). Bootstrap estimates of the median and 95% confidence interval of the predicted probabilities are presented in the nomograms. For most cells in the nomograms, there is a greater than 25% probability of qualifying for more than one of the pathological stages. In the validation analyses, 72.4% of the time the nomograms correctly predicted the probability of a pathological stage to within 10% (organ-confined disease, 67.3%; isolated capsular penetration, 59.6%; seminal vesicle involvement, 79.6%; pelvic lymph node involvement, 82.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The data represent a multi-institutional modeling and validation of the clinical utility of combining PSA level measurement, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage for a group of men with localized prostate cancer. Clinicians can use these nomograms when counseling individual patients regarding the probability of their tumor being a specific pathological stage; this will enable patients and physicians to make more informed treatment decisions based on the probability of a pathological stage, as well as risk tolerance and the values they place on various potential outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9145716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  251 in total

1.  Patterns of prostate cancer treatment by clinical stage and age.

Authors:  D Meltzer; B Egleston; I Abdalla
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Early chemohormonal therapy in prostate cancer: preliminary data and randomized trials.

Authors:  Daniel P Petrylak
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Caveolin-1 upregulation contributes to c-Myc-induced high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Alexei A Goltsov; Chengzhen Ren; Shinji Kurosaka; Kohei Edamura; Richard Logothetis; Francesco J DeMayo; Patricia Troncoso; Jorge Blando; John DiGiovanni; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  Is it necessary to do staging pelvic lymph node dissection for T1c prostate cancer?

Authors:  M V Meng; P R Carroll
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  [Indications for and results of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Graefen; P G Hammerer; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Artificial neural networks for predictive modeling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduard J Gamito; E David Crawford
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass; Sumit Isharwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  The 'CaP Calculator': an online decision support tool for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew S Katz; Jason A Efstathiou; Anthony V D'Amico; Michael W Kattan; Martin G Sanda; Paul L Nguyen; Matthew R Smith; Peter R Carroll; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.