Literature DB >> 9605647

A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

M W Kattan1, J A Eastham, A M Stapleton, T M Wheeler, P T Scardino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few published studies have combined clinical prognostic factors into risk profiles that can be used to predict the likelihood of recurrence or metastatic progression in patients following treatment of prostate cancer. We developed a nomogram that allows prediction of disease recurrence through use of preoperative clinical factors for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who are candidates for treatment with a radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: By use of Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we modeled the clinical data and disease follow-up for 983 men with clinically localized prostate cancer whom we intended to treat with a radical prostatectomy. Clinical data included pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen levels, biopsy Gleason scores, and clinical stage. Treatment failure was recorded when there was clinical evidence of disease recurrence, a rising serum prostate-specific antigen level (two measurements of 0.4 ng/mL or greater and rising), or initiation of adjuvant therapy. Validation was performed on a separate sample of 168 men, also from our institution.
RESULTS: Treatment failure (i.e., cancer recurrence) was noted in 196 of the 983 men, and the patients without failure had a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 1-146 months). The 5-year probability of freedom from failure for the cohort was 73% (95% confidence interval = 69%-76%). The predictions from the nomogram appeared accurate and discriminating, with a validation sample area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (i.e., comparison of the predicted probability with the actual outcome) of 0.79.
CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram has been developed that can be used to predict the 5-year probability of treatment failure among men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9605647     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.10.766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  275 in total

Review 1.  [Indications for and results of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Graefen; P G Hammerer; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Significance of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Paul; H Van Randenborgh; H Kübler; M Alschibaja; R Hartung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Artificial neural networks for predictive modeling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduard J Gamito; E David Crawford
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Predicting the clinical course of prostate cancer.

Authors:  James McKiernan; Mitchell C Benson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The pursuit of the "perfect" biomarker in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Molecular sampling of prostate cancer: a dilemma for predicting disease progression.

Authors:  Andrea Sboner; Francesca Demichelis; Stefano Calza; Yudi Pawitan; Sunita R Setlur; Yujin Hoshida; Sven Perner; Hans-Olov Adami; Katja Fall; Lorelei A Mucci; Philip W Kantoff; Meir Stampfer; Swen-Olof Andersson; Eberhard Varenhorst; Jan-Erik Johansson; Mark B Gerstein; Todd R Golub; Mark A Rubin; Ove Andrén
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 7.  The 'CaP Calculator': an online decision support tool for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew S Katz; Jason A Efstathiou; Anthony V D'Amico; Michael W Kattan; Martin G Sanda; Paul L Nguyen; Matthew R Smith; Peter R Carroll; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Anastasiou; Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Adamakis; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Antonios Balangas; Anastasios Kollias; Kitty Pavlakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Should we abstain from Gleason score 2-4 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer? Results of a German multicentre study.

Authors:  Sabine Brookman-May; Matthias May; Wolf-Ferdinand Wieland; Steffen Lebentrau; Sven Gunia; Stefan Koch; Christian Gilfrich; Jan Roigas; Bernd Hoschke; Maximilian Burger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The impact of dose-escalated radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation for prostate cancer using 2 linked nomograms.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Niraj H Pahlajani; Brian L Egleston; Mark K Buyyounouski; David Y T Chen; Eric M Horwitz; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.