Literature DB >> 10197843

Does long-term finasteride therapy affect the histologic features of benign prostatic tissue and prostate cancer on needle biopsy? PLESS Study Group. Proscar Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study.

X J Yang1, K Lecksell, K Short, J Gottesman, L Peterson, J Bannow, P F Schellhammer, W P Fitch, G B Hodge, R Parra, S Rouse, J Waldstreicher, J I Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Finasteride, a common agent used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), inhibits 5-alpha-reductase. Testosterone is converted by 5-alpha-reductase to the more potent dihydrotestosterone, which is the primary androgen in the prostate. Leuprolide is a stronger antiandrogen that is used to downstage prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. Leuprolide induces marked atrophy of prostate carcinoma cells, which sometimes makes pathologic diagnosis of cancer difficult, although evaluation at radical prostatectomy is easier than at biopsy. It is unknown whether finasteride produces similar changes, which would result in greater diagnostic difficulty because such changes would be seen on biopsy to rule out cancer in men with suspicious clinical findings treated for BPH. The current study investigated the histologic effects of finasteride therapy on human prostate cancer and benign prostatic tissue on needle biopsy.
METHODS: In blinded manner, we reviewed 53 needle biopsy specimens showing prostate carcinoma (35 treated with finasteride, 18 with placebo). Also reviewed in blinded manner were 50 benign needle biopsy specimens (25 treated with finasteride, 25 with placebo). The Gleason score, number of cores involved, percentage cancer involvement in a core, percentage of atrophic changes in cancer cells, presence of mitoses, blue-tinged mucinous secretions, prominent nucleoli, and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia were documented for each case in the cancer group. The percentage of atrophy, basal cell hyperplasia, transitional metaplasia, chronic inflammation, and stromal proliferation was documented for each case in the benign group.
RESULTS: No significant histologic differences were present in either the benign or cancer group between cases treated with finasteride and placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that finasteride treatment for BPH does not cause difficulty in the diagnosis of cancer in prostate needle specimens. It is possible that there are severely atrophic areas resulting from finasteride treatment that are undersampled. However, the conclusion that cancer seen on needle biopsy in men treated with finasteride is unaltered and readily identified as cancer remains valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10197843     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00579-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  14 in total

1.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  David G Bostwick; Lina Liu; Michael K Brawer; Junqi Qian
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

2.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia: caveat for finasteride should be discussed before prescribing.

Authors:  Hussam Ammar; Ashok K Malani; Chakshu Gupta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-23

3.  Finasteride treatment alters tissue specific androgen receptor expression in prostate tissues.

Authors:  Tyler M Bauman; Priyanka D Sehgal; Karen A Johnson; Thomas Pier; Reginald C Bruskewitz; William A Ricke; Wei Huang
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: an overview.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

5.  DNA methyl transferase 1 reduces expression of SRD5A2 in the aging adult prostate.

Authors:  Rongbin Ge; Zongwei Wang; Seth K Bechis; Alexander G Otsetov; Shengyu Hua; Shulin Wu; Chin-Lee Wu; Shahin Tabatabaei; Aria F Olumi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Gleason grade remains an important prognostic predictor in men diagnosed with prostate cancer while on finasteride therapy.

Authors:  Brett S Carver; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Variability in the androgen response of prostate epithelium to 5alpha-reductase inhibition: implications for prostate cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Elahe A Mostaghel; Linda Geng; Ilona Holcomb; Ilsa M Coleman; Jared Lucas; Lawrence D True; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  The rationale for inhibiting 5alpha-reductase isoenzymes in the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Donald J Tindall; Roger S Rittmaster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the prostate: the precursor lesion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debra L Zynger; Ximing Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-12-22

10.  Gleason grading controversies: what the chemoprevention trials have taught us.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Fred Saad; John Trachtenberg; Alexandre Zlotta
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.