Literature DB >> 15680388

Physiologic properties of small intestine submucosa.

Benjamin K Poulose1, Stefan Scholz, Derek E Moore, Carl R Schmidt, Eric L Grogan, Oliver B Lao, Lillian Nanney, Jeff Davidson, Michael D Holzman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Porcine small intestine submucosa (SiS) has been introduced as a bioprosthesis in herniorrhaphy. This study evaluates in vivo properties of SiS that would affect clinical use.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve pigs underwent implantation of SiS (perforated and nonperforated) on the peritoneal surface. Gross characteristics were evaluated and random samples harvested for histological study at 2 (n = 6) and 8 (n = 6) weeks. Collagen deposition was determined by polarized microscopy. Neovascularity (percent area blood vessels, %A(bv)) was determined by immunohistochemical staining with a polyclonal CD-31 antibody.
RESULTS: Perforated SiS had a higher density of capillary ingrowth compared with nonperforated at both 2 (5.6%A(bv) versus 1.4%A(bv), P < 0.05) and 8 weeks (6.0%A(bv) versus 1.6%A(bv), P < 0.05). Compared with 2 weeks, 8-week SiS had a larger proportion of incorporation (25% versus 83%, P < 0.05) and new collagen deposition (50% versus 94%, P < 0.05). Significant contraction was observed in SiS 8 weeks after implantation (preimplant area 98 cm2 versus post-implant area 50 cm2, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: SiS incorporated well 8 weeks after implantation, with deposition of new collagen. Perforated SiS demonstrated a more rapid and greater amount of neovascularity. The degree of contraction suggests that larger areas of SiS should be selected for herniorrhaphy than would be necessary if synthetic materials were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15680388     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  14 in total

1.  Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Paulo Cezar Feldner; Rodrigo Aquino Castro; Luiz Antonio Cipolotti; Carlos Antonio Delroy; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori; Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Use of porcine small intestine submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow up assessment; Surg Endosc (2008) 22: 1941-1946.

Authors:  Alexander H Petter-Puchner; René H Fortelny
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration.

Authors:  A H Petter-Puchner; R H Fortelny; K Silic; J Brand; S Gruber-Blum; H Redl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa implants in experimental ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  A H Petter-Puchner; R H Fortelny; R Mittermayr; N Walder; W Ohlinger; H Redl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Carlos A Pellegrini; John Hunter; Nathaniel Soper; Michael Brunt; Brett Sheppard; Blair Jobe; Nayak Polissar; Lee Mitsumori; James Nelson; L Swanstrom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  M Ditzel; E B Deerenberg; N Grotenhuis; J J Harlaar; K Monkhorst; Y M Bastiaansen-Jenniskens; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Biomaterials: so many choices, so little time. What are the differences?

Authors:  John D Hunter; Jamie A Cannon
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

8.  Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: an experimental study.

Authors:  K C Harth; A-M Broome; M R Jacobs; J A Blatnik; F Zeinali; S Bajaksouzian; M J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Paraesophageal hernia repair with biomesh does not increase postoperative dysphagia.

Authors:  Trudie A Goers; Maria A Cassera; Christy M Dunst; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa implants in experimental ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  A Petter-Puchner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.