Literature DB >> 16998356

Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Brant K Oelschlager1, Carlos A Pellegrini, John Hunter, Nathaniel Soper, Michael Brunt, Brett Sheppard, Blair Jobe, Nayak Polissar, Lee Mitsumori, James Nelson, L Swanstrom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) is associated with a high recurrence rate. Repair with synthetic mesh lowers recurrence but can cause dysphagia and visceral erosions. This trial was designed to study the value of a biologic prosthesis, small intestinal submucosa (SIS), in LPEHR.
METHODS: Patients undergoing LPEHR (n = 108) at 4 institutions were randomized to primary repair -1 degrees (n = 57) or primary repair buttressed with SIS (n = 51) using a standardized technique. The primary outcome measure was evidence of recurrent hernia (> or =2 cm) on UGI, read by a study radiologist blinded to the randomization status, 6 months after operation.
RESULTS: At 6 months, 99 (93%) patients completed clinical symptomatic follow-up and 95 (90%) patients had an UGI. The groups had similar clinical presentations (symptom profile, quality of life, type and size of hernia, esophageal length, and BMI). Operative times (SIS 202 minutes vs. 1 degrees 183 minutes, P = 0.15) and perioperative complications did not differ. There were no operations for recurrent hernia nor mesh-related complications. At 6 months, 4 patients (9%) developed a recurrent hernia >2 cm in the SIS group and 12 patients (24%) in the 1 degrees group (P = 0.04). Both groups experienced a significant reduction in all measured symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, chest pain, early satiety, and postprandial pain) and improved QOL (SF-36) after operation. There was no difference between groups in either pre or postoperative symptom severity. Patients with a recurrent hernia had more chest pain (2.7 vs. 1.0, P = 0.03) and early satiety (2.8 vs. 1.3, P = 0.02) and worse physical functioning (63 vs. 72, P = 0.03 per SF-36).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding a biologic prosthesis during LPEHR reduces the likelihood of recurrence at 6 months, without mesh-related complications or side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16998356      PMCID: PMC1856552          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000237759.42831.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  33 in total

1.  Small intestinal submucosa for laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Paul S Strange
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2003

2.  Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias.

Authors:  J K Champion; D Rock
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic tension-free repair of large paraesophageal hernias.

Authors:  M G Paul; R P DeRosa; P E Petrucci; M L Palmer; S H Danovitch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  D P Congreve
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1992-02

5.  Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: medium-term outcome of 116 patients.

Authors:  Sergio Diaz; L Michael Brunt; Mary E Klingensmith; Peggy M Frisella; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Massive hiatal hernia with incarceration: a report of 53 cases.

Authors:  F G Pearson; J D Cooper; R Ilves; T R Todd; W R Jamieson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  M E Franklin; J J Gonzalez; J L Glass
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Management of intrathoracic stomach with polypropylene mesh prosthesis reinforced transabdominal hiatus hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Carlson; R E Condon; K A Ludwig; W J Schulte
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Paraesophageal hiatus hernia.

Authors:  F H Ellis; R E Crozier; J A Shea
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-04

Review 10.  Repair of ventral hernias in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass should not be deferred.

Authors:  G M Eid; S G Mattar; G Hamad; D R Cottam; J L Lord; A Watson; R M Dallal; P R Schauer; M Dallal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  162 in total

1.  Approach to asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia: watchful waiting or elective laparoscopic hernia repair?

Authors:  James J Jung; David M Naimark; Ramy Behman; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quality of life after collis gastroplasty for short esophagus in patients with paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Katie S Nason; James D Luketich; Omar Awais; Ghulam Abbas; Arjun Pennathur; Rodney J Landreneau; Matthew J Schuchert
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation.

Authors:  Michael Parker; Steven P Bowers; Jillian M Bray; Adam S Harris; Erol V Belli; Jason M Pfluke; Susanne Preissler; Horacio J Asbun; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Durability of giant hiatus hernia repair in 455 patients over 20 years.

Authors:  P A Le Page; R Furtado; M Hayward; S Law; A Tan; S J Vivian; H Van der Wall; G L Falk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Surgical and clinical outcomes comparison of mesh usage in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Crystal Krause; Tailong Xu; Valerie Shostrom; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Quantifying tension in tension-free hiatal hernia repair: a new intra-operative technique.

Authors:  Lalin Navaratne; Hutan Ashrafian; Alberto Martínez-Isla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Dual-sided composite mesh repair of hiatal hernia: our experience and a review of the Chinese literature.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Wei Tang; Cheng-Xiang Shan; Sheng Liu; Zhi-Guo Jiang; Dao-Zhen Jiang; Xiang-Min Zheng; Ming Qiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair: a survey of SAGES members.

Authors:  Jason M Pfluke; Michael Parker; Steven P Bowers; Horacio J Asbun; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Katie S Nason; Neil A Christie; Arjun Pennathur; Blair A Jobe; Rodney J Landreneau; Matthew J Schuchert
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Management of acute paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Mohammed Bawahab; Philip Mitchell; Neal Church; Estifanos Debru
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.