Literature DB >> 16738987

Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa implants in experimental ventral hernia repair.

A H Petter-Puchner1, R H Fortelny, R Mittermayr, N Walder, W Ohlinger, H Redl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomeshes made of porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) have recently been suggested for repair of ventral hernia. A fully biodegradable combination of implant and fibrin sealant fixation was assessed in a new rat model with sutures serving as control.
METHODS: In 10 Sprague-Dawley rats, two defects per animal were created in the abdominal wall left and right of the linea alba (1 cm in diameter), and the peritoneum was spared. The lesions were left untreated for 10 days to achieve a chronic condition and were then covered with SIS (2 x 2 cm), sealed or sutured (n = 10 per group). Randomization allowed sealant and sutures in one animal. Animals were killed on postoperative day 17, and implant sites were analyzed macroscopically, histologically, and microbiologically.
RESULTS: Abscedation, encapsulation, and putrid seroma were observed in all samples, regardless of fixation technique. Histology revealed lytic necrosis and extensive inflammatory response of the surrounding tissue. Tissue samples obtained from three implant sites were positive for beta-hemolytic Streptococcus. SIS was not detectable after 17 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects were observed using SIS in an experimental model of ventral hernia and were not linked to fixation method or study design. Further experimental investigations on SIS are necessary before its clinical use in hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738987     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0568-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Physical characteristics of small intestinal submucosa scaffolds are location-dependent.

Authors:  Devanathan Raghavan; Bradley P Kropp; H-K Lin; Yuanyuan Zhang; Richard Cowan; Sundararajan V Madihally
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Late mesh rejection as a complication to transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair.

Authors:  C Hofbauer; P V Andersen; P Juul; N Qvist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Pseudoaneurysm formation in a subset of patients with small intestinal submucosa biologic patches after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Robert A McCready; Jason Hodde; Randy J Irwin; Arthur C Coffey; Janet L Divelbiss; M Ann Bryant; Richard W Chitwood; Douglas S Paget; Bart A Chess
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; A N Kingsnorth; R G Molloy; P K Small; B Lammers; G Horeyseck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  Alexander H Petter-Puchner; R Fortelny; R Mittermayr; W Ohlinger; H Redl
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area.

Authors:  J Conze; R Rosch; U Klinge; C Weiss; M Anurov; S Titkowa; A Oettinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia.

Authors:  S Kumar; R G Wilson; S J Nixon; I M C Macintyre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

Authors:  J M McGreevy; P P Goodney; C M Birkmeyer; S R G Finlayson; W S Laycock; J D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice.

Authors:  E R Winslow; M Quasebarth; L M Brunt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  18 in total

1.  Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) implants in experimental ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  F Catena; L Ansaloni; L D'Alessandro; A Pinna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Wolfgang B Gaertner; Margaret E Bonsack; John P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) for the assessment of hernia mesh integration: a comparison to standard histology in an experimental model.

Authors:  A Petter-Puchner; S Gruber-Blum; N Walder; R H Fortelny; H Redl; K Raum
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.

Authors:  S Gruber-Blum; J Brand; C Keibl; R H Fortelny; H Redl; F Mayer; A H Petter-Puchner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  A comparison of Progrip(®) and Adhesix (®) self-adhering hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  S Gruber-Blum; N Riepl; J Brand; C Keibl; H Redl; R H Fortelny; A H Petter-Puchner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response.

Authors:  Joseph M Aamodt; David W Grainger
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: an experimental study.

Authors:  K C Harth; A-M Broome; M R Jacobs; J A Blatnik; F Zeinali; S Bajaksouzian; M J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Transthoracic repair of an incarcerated diaphragmatic hernia using hexamethylene diisocyanate cross-linked porcine dermal collagen (Permacol).

Authors:  Benn Gooch; Neil Smart; Saj Wajed
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-15

9.  Blood vessel matrix: a new alternative for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  C F Bellows; W Jian; M K McHale; D Cardenas; J L West; S P Lerner; G E Amiel
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Multicentric observational cohort study evaluating a composite mesh with incorporated oxidized regenerated cellulose in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  F Berrevoet; K Fierens; J De Gols; B Navez; W Van Bastelaere; E Meir; R Ceulemans
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.