Literature DB >> 8580504

Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones.

M Valente1, D A Fabry, L G Potts.   

Abstract

Fifty subjects with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss and prior experience with amplification were evaluated at two sites (25 subjects at each site). Speech recognition in noise scores were measured using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) for each subject while wearing binaural behind-the-ear hearing aids allowing switching between two fitting algorithms ("basic" and "party") and two microphone conditions (single microphone omnidirectional and dual-microphone directional). Results revealed an average improvement in signal-to-noise ration (SNR) of 7.4 to 8.5 dB at the two sites for the directional conditions in comparison to the omnidirectional conditions. No significant improvement in SNR was measured between the two fitting algorithms. In addition, the Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (PHAB) (Site I) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) (Site II) were administered. Results revealed that the benefit scores for background noise and reduced cues (Site I) and background noise and aversiveness of sounds (Site II) were significantly higher than those reported in the established norms. Finally, 76 percent of the subjects of Site I reported that the experimental hearing aids provided "significantly better" or "better" performance than their current hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8580504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  15 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Baha® Divino™.

Authors:  Kristi Oeding; Michael Valente; Jessica Kerckhoff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

3.  Directional hearing AIDS.

Authors:  T A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-12

4.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

5.  Selecting and Pre-setting Amplification for Children: Where Do We Begin?

Authors:  D E Lewis
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

6.  Use of microphone technology to improve user performance in noise.

Authors:  M Valente
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-09

7.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

8.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Syed Shabih Hasan; Sean DeVries; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.