Literature DB >> 12141388

Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference.

Rauna K Surr1, Brian E Walden, Mary T Cord, Laurel Olson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics of everyday listening situations that influence user preferences for omnidirectional versus directional hearing aid microphones. Eleven experienced hearing aid users were fitted with digital hearing aids featuring switchable omnidirectional (OMNI) and adaptive-directional (DIR) modes (programs). For 6 weeks, their task was to identify and describe at least one listening situation each day in which one program performed better than the other using a checklist daily journal format. All participants reported difficulty identifying situations in which they could perceive a difference between the two microphone modes. Although an equal number had been requested, descriptions favoring the DIR outnumbered those for the OMNI. Chi-square tests were used to compare the distributions of 60 descriptions favoring the OMNI and 155 favoring the DIR across variables associated with the primary talker to whom the hearing aid user was listening, background noise, and other environmental characteristics. The results indicated that location of the primary talker, presence or absence and type of background noise, and type of space in which the communication occurred influenced microphone choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  7 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Adult aural rehabilitation: what is it and does it work?

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-06

3.  Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.

Authors:  Catherine V Palmer; Ruth Bentler; H Gustav Mueller
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

4.  Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.

Authors:  Gabriel Aldaz; Sunil Puria; Larry J Leifer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 5.  Statistical Considerations for Analyzing Ecological Momentary Assessment Data.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson; Michelle A Jones; Erik J Jorgensen; Yu-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Broadband beamforming compensation algorithm in CI front-end acquisition.

Authors:  Yousheng Chen; Qin Gong
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Comparison of In-Situ and Retrospective Self-Reports on Assessing Hearing Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Anna Gudjonsdottir; Jacob Oleson; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.245

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.