Literature DB >> 15677723

Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Fan-Gang Zeng1, Kaibao Nie, Ginger S Stickney, Ying-Yee Kong, Michael Vongphoe, Ashish Bhargave, Chaogang Wei, Keli Cao.   

Abstract

Amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM) are commonly used in communication, but their relative contributions to speech recognition have not been fully explored. To bridge this gap, we derived slowly varying AM and FM from speech sounds and conducted listening tests using stimuli with different modulations in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant subjects. We found that although AM from a limited number of spectral bands may be sufficient for speech recognition in quiet, FM significantly enhances speech recognition in noise, as well as speaker and tone recognition. Additional speech reception threshold measures revealed that FM is particularly critical for speech recognition with a competing voice and is independent of spectral resolution and similarity. These results suggest that AM and FM provide independent yet complementary contributions to support robust speech recognition under realistic listening situations. Encoding FM may improve auditory scene analysis, cochlear-implant, and audiocoding performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677723      PMCID: PMC546014          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0406460102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  F G Zeng; J J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Identifiability of vowels and speakers from whispered syllables.

Authors:  V C Tartter
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

4.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  Chao-Gang Wei; Keli Cao; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The interconversion of audible and visible patterns as a basis for research in the perception of speech.

Authors:  F S COOPER; A M LIBERMAN; J M BORST
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1951-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous vowels with harmonic, shifted, or random components.

Authors:  M H Chalikia; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-02

10.  A common neural code for frequency- and amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  K Saberi; E R Hafter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  103 in total

1.  Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Authors:  Aparajita Bhattacharya; Andrew Vandali; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The biophysical origin of traveling-wave dispersion in the cochlea.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Ding-Jun Zha; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Neural heterogeneities influence envelope and temporal coding at the sensory periphery.

Authors:  M Savard; R Krahe; M J Chacron
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Transformation of temporal processing across auditory cortex of awake macaques.

Authors:  Brian H Scott; Brian J Malone; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

8.  Transformation of temporal properties between auditory midbrain and cortex in the awake Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  Maria Ter-Mikaelian; Dan H Sanes; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.