Literature DB >> 15677718

NMR screening and crystal quality of bacterially expressed prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins in a structural genomics pipeline.

Rebecca Page1, Wolfgang Peti, Ian A Wilson, Raymond C Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich.   

Abstract

In the Joint Center for Structural Genomics, one-dimensional (1D) 1H NMR spectroscopy is routinely used to characterize the folded state of protein targets and, thus, serves to guide subsequent crystallization efforts and to identify proteins for NMR structure determination. Here, we describe 1D 1H NMR screening of a group of 79 mouse homologue proteins, which correlates the NMR data with the outcome of subsequent crystallization experiments and crystallographic structure determination. Based on the 1D 1H NMR spectra, the proteins are classified into four groups, "A" to "D." A-type proteins are candidates for structure determination by NMR or crystallography; "B"-type are earmarked for crystallography; "C" indicates folded globular proteins with broadened line shapes; and "D" are nonglobular, "unfolded" polypeptides. The results obtained from coarse- and fine-screen crystallization trials imply that only A- and B-type proteins should be used for extensive crystallization trials in the future, with C and D proteins subjected only to coarse-screen crystallization trials. Of the presently studied 79 soluble protein targets, 63% yielded A- or B-quality 1D 1H NMR spectra. Although similar yields of crystallization hits were obtained for all four groups, A to D, crystals from A- and B-type proteins diffracted on average to significantly higher resolution than crystals produced from C- or D-type proteins. Furthermore, the output of refined crystal structures from this test set of proteins was 4-fold higher for A- and B-type than for C- and D-type proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677718      PMCID: PMC548552          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0408490102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Structural proteomics of an archaeon.

Authors:  D Christendat; A Yee; A Dharamsi; Y Kluger; A Savchenko; J R Cort; V Booth; C D Mackereth; V Saridakis; I Ekiel; G Kozlov; K L Maxwell; N Wu; L P McIntosh; K Gehring; M A Kennedy; A R Davidson; E F Pai; M Gerstein; A M Edwards; C H Arrowsmith
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-10

2.  Application of NMR in structural proteomics: screening for proteins amenable to structural analysis.

Authors:  Till Rehm; Robert Huber; Tad A Holak
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 3.  Protein expression systems for structural genomics and proteomics.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Role for NMR in structural genomics.

Authors:  Michael A Kennedy; Gaetano T Montelione; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; John L Markley
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2002

5.  Biomolecular NMR using a microcoil NMR probe--new technique for the chemical shift assignment of aromatic side chains in proteins.

Authors:  Wolfgang Peti; James Norcross; Gary Eldridge; Mark O'Neil-Johnson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations.

Authors:  A K Dunker; E Garner; S Guilliot; P Romero; K Albrecht; J Hart; Z Obradovic; C Kissinger; J E Villafranca
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  1998

7.  High-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance-based screening.

Authors:  P J Hajduk; T Gerfin; J M Boehlen; M Häberli; D Marek; S W Fesik
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Manifestations of the tertiary structures of proteins in high-frequency nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  C C McDonald; W D Phillips
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1967-11-22       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  NMR for structural proteomics of Thermotoga maritima: screening and structure determination.

Authors:  Wolfgang Peti; Touraj Etezady-Esfarjani; Torsten Herrmann; Heath E Klock; Scott A Lesley; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2004

10.  Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics.

Authors:  Rune Linding; Lars Juhl Jensen; Francesca Diella; Peer Bork; Toby J Gibson; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  34 in total

1.  Estimation of protein secondary structure content directly from NMR spectra using an improved empirical correlation with averaged chemical shift.

Authors:  S P Mielke; V V Krishnan
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2005-11-09

2.  Novel beta-barrel fold in the nuclear magnetic resonance structure of the replicase nonstructural protein 1 from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

Authors:  Marcius S Almeida; Margaret A Johnson; Torsten Herrmann; Michael Geralt; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Combinatorial Domain Hunting: An effective approach for the identification of soluble protein domains adaptable to high-throughput applications.

Authors:  Stefanie Reich; Loretto H Puckey; Caroline L Cheetham; Richard Harris; Ammar A E Ali; Uma Bhattacharyya; Kate Maclagan; Keith A Powell; Chrisostomos Prodromou; Laurence H Pearl; Paul C Driscoll; Renos Savva
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Rapid measurement of 3J(H N-H alpha) and 3J(N-H beta) coupling constants in polypeptides.

Authors:  Ravi Pratap Barnwal; Ashok K Rout; Kandala V R Chary; Hanudatta S Atreya
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  High-throughput screening of optimal solution conditions for structural biological studies by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Toshihiko Sugiki; Chie Yoshiura; Yutaka Kofuku; Takumi Ueda; Ichio Shimada; Hideo Takahashi
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Parallel screening and optimization of protein constructs for structural studies.

Authors:  Rodolfo M Rasia; Marjolaine Noirclerc-Savoye; Nicolás G Bologna; Benoit Gallet; Michael J Plevin; Laurence Blanchard; Javier F Palatnik; Bernhard Brutscher; Thierry Vernet; Jérôme Boisbouvier
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Remedial strategies in structural proteomics: expression, purification, and crystallization of the Vav1/Rac1 complex.

Authors:  Alexei Brooun; Scott A Foster; Jill E Chrencik; Ellen Y T Chien; Anand R Kolatkar; Markus Streiff; Paul Ramage; Hans Widmer; Gisbert Weckbecker; Peter Kuhn
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.650

8.  CSSI-PRO: a method for secondary structure type editing, assignment and estimation in proteins using linear combination of backbone chemical shifts.

Authors:  Monalisa Swain; Hanudatta S Atreya
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Prediction of protein crystallization outcome using a hybrid method.

Authors:  Frank H Zucker; Christine Stewart; Jaclyn dela Rosa; Jessica Kim; Li Zhang; Liren Xiao; Jenni Ross; Alberto J Napuli; Natascha Mueller; Lisa J Castaneda; Stephen R Nakazawa Hewitt; Tracy L Arakaki; Eric T Larson; Easwara Subramanian; Christophe L M J Verlinde; Erkang Fan; Frederick S Buckner; Wesley C Van Voorhis; Ethan A Merritt; Wim G J Hol
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.867

10.  PDZ Sample Quality Assessment by Biochemical and Biophysical Characterizations.

Authors:  Célia Caillet-Saguy; Sébastien Brûlé; Nicolas Wolff; Bertrand Raynal
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.