Literature DB >> 2600304

Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation.

W A Yost1, S Sheft, J Opie.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to assess the effect of the rate of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) of a masker tone on detection of SAM of a probe tone (experiment 1) or on SAM-rate discrimination for the probe tone (experiment 2). When modulated at the same rate as the probe, the masker interfered with both the detection of probe modulation and the discrimination of the rate of probe modulation. The interference was obtained when the masker was either higher or lower in frequency than the probe (the probe and masker were separated by 2 oct). The amount of interference in detecting probe modulation (experiment 1) decreased as the common base rate of modulation was increased from 5 to 200 Hz. For rate discrimination (experiment 2), the amount of interference remained approximately the same for base rates of 2-40 Hz, the range over which rate discrimination was measured. In both experiments, the amount of interference was reduced when the masker was modulated at a different rate than the probe.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2600304     DOI: 10.1121/1.398474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception.

Authors:  T D Carrell; J M Opie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Age-Related Changes in Processing Simultaneous Amplitude Modulated Sounds Assessed Using Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-23

6.  Perceptual learning and generalization resulting from training on an auditory amplitude-modulation detection task.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of speech-rhythm disruption on selective listening with a single background talker.

Authors:  J Devin McAuley; Yi Shen; Toni Smith; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Christian Lorenzi; Laurianne Cabrera; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.