Literature DB >> 15605191

Comparison between the Klemetti index and heel DXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density in the elderly.

Anders Halling1, G Rutger Persson, Johan Berglund, Owe Johansson, Stefan Renvert.   

Abstract

Osteopenia/osteoporosis affect many elderly people and might not be detected until symptoms of fractures occur. Early detection of osteopenia/osteoporosis is important and would allow preventive measures and treatment. Access to screening for osteopenia/osteoporosis is often limited, whereas panoramic radiography is commonly used in dentistry. The aim of this study was to determine the validity of the Klemetti index (KI), measured on panoramic radiographs, in the diagnosis of osteopenia/osteoporosis as defined by a bone mineral density (BMD) measurement below -1.5 standard deviations (SDs) of a community based sample. In total, 211 consecutive participants (102 men and 109 women) 60-96 years in the SNAC-Blekinge study (Swedish National Study on Ageing and Care) underwent bone densitometry [by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] of both heels. A panoramic radiograph was taken of each participant, and mandibular cortex on a panoramic radiograph was classified as '0' or normal (even and sharp endosteal margin), '1', moderately eroded (evidence of lacunar resorption or endosteal cortical residues), or '2', severely eroded (unequivocal porosity). From logistic regression, the odds ratio of having a BMD measurement below -1.5 SD was 8.04 (95% CI 2.39 to 27.12, P<0.001) in the 'osteopenic' (KI category 2), compared with the 'normal' group (KI categories 0 and 1). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to measure the validity of the KI indicating osteopenia (KI category 2) in predicting reduced BMD. This point provided a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 89%. Positive and negative predictive values were 21% and 97%, respectively. There were 87% correctly classified subjects. The area under the ROC curve was 0.64. The present study demonstrated that a negative finding (KI category <2) is highly predictive of the absence of osteopenia/osteoporosis as defined by the DXA measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15605191     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1796-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  28 in total

1.  Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?

Authors:  M Hudelmaier; V Kuhn; E M Lochmüller; H Well; M Priemel; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: a comparison between four different methods.

Authors:  A Ekman; K Michaëlsson; M Petrén-Mallmin; S Ljunghall; H Mallmin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Periodontal diseases and osteoporosis: association and mechanisms.

Authors:  J Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Ann Periodontol       Date:  2001-12

4.  Oral findings in osteoporosis. Part II: Relationship between residual ridge and alveolar bone resorption and generalized skeletal osteopenia.

Authors:  P J Kribbs; D E Smith; C H Chesnut
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Assessment of periodontal conditions and systemic disease in older subjects. I. Focus on osteoporosis.

Authors:  R E Persson; L G Hollender; L V Powell; M I MacEntee; C C L Wyatt; H A Kiyak; G R Persson
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Use of a peripheral dexa measurement for osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  Julienne K Kirk; Mindy Nichols; John G Spangler
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; B Jonsson; C De Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Osteoporosis: a risk factor in periodontal disease.

Authors:  N von Wowern; B Klausen; G Kollerup
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Bone mineral density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: reference population, definition of peak bone mass, and measured site determine prevalence.

Authors:  O Löfman; L Larsson; G Toss
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Ability of peripheral DXA measurement to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

Authors:  D Picard; J P Brown; L Rosenthall; M Couturier; J Lévesque; M Dumont; L-G Ste-Marie; A Tenenhouse; S Dodin
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  29 in total

1.  Assessment of bone mineral density in the jaws and its relationship to radiomorphometric indices.

Authors:  A Gulsahi; C S Paksoy; S Ozden; N O Kucuk; A R I Cebeci; Y Genc
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Mikio Tsuda; Masahiko Ohtsuka; Ichiro Kodama; Mitsuhiro Sanada; Takashi Nakamoto; Koji Inagaki; Toshihide Noguchi; Yoshiki Kudo; Yoshikazu Suei; Keiji Tanimoto; Anne-Marie Bollen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Panoramic measures for oral bone mass in detecting osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Calciolari; N Donos; J C Park; A Petrie; N Mardas
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Mandibular inferior cortex erosion as a sign of elevated total serum calcium in elderly people: a 9-year follow-up study.

Authors:  B Kiswanjaya; A Yoshihara; H Miyazaki
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Use of digital panoramic radiography as an auxiliary means of low bone mineral density detection in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  C S Valerio; A M Trindade; E T Mazzieiro; T P Amaral; F R Manzi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Coincidence of calcified carotid atheromatous plaque, osteoporosis, and periodontal bone loss in dental panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Aruna Ramesh; Sheila Soroushian; Rumpa Ganguly
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-12-12

7.  A comparison of the mandibular index on panoramic and cross-sectional images from CBCT exams from osteoporosis risk group.

Authors:  C C Gomes; G L de Rezende Barbosa; R P Bello; F N Bóscolo; S M de Almeida
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Assessing qualitative changes in simulated periodontal ligament and alveolar bone using a non-contact electromagnetic vibration device.

Authors:  Chiaki Kobayashi; Makoto Hayashi; Masaru Yamaoka; Kazuhiro Hashimoto; Takeshi Kato; Norio Komori; Bunnai Ogiso
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of antegonial index, mental index, panoramic mandibular index and mandibular cortical index values in the panoramic radiographs of normal males and male patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Dagistan; O M Bilge
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 10.  Clinical guidelines for the application of panoramic radiographs in screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Ray Tanaka; Naoya Kakimoto; Yasuhiro Morimoto; Yoshinori Arai; Takafumi Hayashi; Tohru Kurabayashi; Akitoshi Katsumata; Junichi Asaumi
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.