Literature DB >> 33620644

Clinical guidelines for the application of panoramic radiographs in screening for osteoporosis.

Akira Taguchi1, Ray Tanaka2, Naoya Kakimoto3, Yasuhiro Morimoto4, Yoshinori Arai5, Takafumi Hayashi6, Tohru Kurabayashi7, Akitoshi Katsumata8, Junichi Asaumi9.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures are associated with an increased risk of subsequent fractures, a higher rate of mortality, and incremental medical costs. Incidental findings, which include some measurements related to the mandibular inferior cortex and the alveolar trabecular bone pattern of the mandible determined on panoramic radiographs, are considered to be a useful tool for identifying asymptomatic individuals at risk of having osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures. We undertook a worldwide literature survey and present the following clinical recommendations. Postmenopausal female dental patients with a mandibular inferior cortical width of less than 3 mm on panoramic radiographs may be at risk of having low skeletal bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis, but not fragility fractures. In addition, those with a severely eroded mandibular inferior cortex may have an increased risk of having low skeletal BMD, osteoporosis, and fragility fractures. The alveolar trabecular bone pattern of the mandible might be useful for identifying female dental patients at risk of having fragility fractures, although further investigation is necessary to confirm this possibility. These incidental findings on panoramic radiographs, when used for identifying asymptomatic postmenopausal female patients at risk of having osteoporosis in general dental practice, may be helpful in reducing the incidence of first fractures, with a consequent reduction in the secondary fractures, medical costs, and mortality associated with osteoporotic fragility fractures, without incurring any additional cost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone density; Fragility fracture; Mandible; Osteoporosis; Panoramic radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33620644     DOI: 10.1007/s11282-021-00518-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Radiol        ISSN: 0911-6028            Impact factor:   1.852


  85 in total

1.  Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study.

Authors:  Noriko Yoshimura; Shigeyuki Muraki; Hiroyuki Oka; Akihiko Mabuchi; Yoshio En-Yo; Munehito Yoshida; Akihiko Saika; Hideyo Yoshida; Takao Suzuki; Seizo Yamamoto; Hideaki Ishibashi; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Toru Akune
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-08-18       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group.

Authors:  E Klemetti; S Kolmakov; H Kröger
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1994-02

4.  Risk of mortality following clinical fractures.

Authors:  J A Cauley; D E Thompson; K C Ensrud; J C Scott; D Black
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  World-wide projections for hip fracture.

Authors:  B Gullberg; O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.

Authors:  Rena Oka; Masahiro Ohira; Sawako Suzuki; Tomohiko Yoshida; Hisashi Koide; Tomoaki Tanaka; Ichiro Tatsuno
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 2.349

Review 7.  The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; H Johansson; C De Laet; J Brown; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; C Christiansen; S Cummings; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; C Glüer; D Goltzman; D Hans; M-A Krieg; A La Croix; E McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; K Sanders; A-M Schott; A Silman; D Torgerson; T van Staa; N B Watts; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Ethnic difference of clinical vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C H Bow; E Cheung; C L Cheung; S M Xiao; C Loong; C Soong; K C Tan; M M Luckey; J A Cauley; S Fujiwara; A W C Kung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Hip fracture incidence in Japan: Estimates of new patients in 2012 and 25-year trends.

Authors:  H Orimo; Y Yaegashi; T Hosoi; Y Fukushima; T Onoda; T Hashimoto; K Sakata
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Fracture prevention by screening for high fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Merlijn; K M A Swart; H E van der Horst; J C Netelenbos; P J M Elders
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mental foramen in panoramic radiography can be a reference for discrimination of punched-out lesions in the mandible in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Shimada; Yuki Shiko; Fumihiko Nakamura; Akira Hangaishi; Yohei Kawasaki; Yutaka Maruoka
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Identification of osteoporosis using ensemble deep learning model with panoramic radiographs and clinical covariates.

Authors:  Shintaro Sukegawa; Ai Fujimura; Akira Taguchi; Norio Yamamoto; Akira Kitamura; Ryosuke Goto; Keisuke Nakano; Kiyofumi Takabatake; Hotaka Kawai; Hitoshi Nagatsuka; Yoshihiko Furuki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Inflammasomes in Alveolar Bone Loss.

Authors:  Yang Li; Junqi Ling; Qianzhou Jiang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 7.561

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.