Literature DB >> 14742895

Ability of peripheral DXA measurement to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

D Picard1, J P Brown, L Rosenthall, M Couturier, J Lévesque, M Dumont, L-G Ste-Marie, A Tenenhouse, S Dodin.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate the utility of peripheral measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, we measured BMD at the spine and femoral neck with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), at phalanx with AccuDXA (Schick) as well as proximal and distal forearm with pDXA (Norland) in 835 women ranging in age from 20 to 85 yr. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, where a positive case was defined as a T-score < or = -2.5 either on spine or femoral neck, the areas under the curve were not significantly different between sites. At a T-score of -2.5 as determined by each peripheral apparatus, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.39 and 0.95 for phalanx and 0.75 and 0.85 for proximal forearm whereas they were 0.42 and 0.96 for distal forearm. Using optimal absolute BMD cutoff values improved the results. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.79 and 0.83 for phalanx at an absolute BMD value of 0.436 and 0.84 and 0.79 for proximal forearm at a value of 0.703, whereas they were 0.90 and 0.75 for distal forearm at a value of 0.208. Combining the two forearm measurements improves the results slightly. At cutoff values of 0.641 and 0.252, respectively for proximal and distal forearms, sensitivity was 0.83 and specificity was 0.84. Therefore, a peripheral measurement of BMD together with a good clinical evaluation of the osteoporosis risk profile of the patient, can be an interesting tool for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in areas where central DXA is not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14742895     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:7:1:111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  4 in total

1.  Bone health in healthy Indian population aged 50 years and above.

Authors:  R K Marwaha; N Tandon; M K Garg; R Kanwar; A Narang; A Sastry; A Saberwal; K Bhadra; A Mithal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.

Authors:  Ki Hyuk Sung; Young Choi; Gyeong Hee Cho; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Comparison between the Klemetti index and heel DXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density in the elderly.

Authors:  Anders Halling; G Rutger Persson; Johan Berglund; Owe Johansson; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Prescreening for osteoporosis with forearm bone densitometry in health examination population.

Authors:  Chun Yue; Na Ding; Lu-Lu Xu; Ya-Qian Fu; Yuan-Wei Guo; Yan-Yi Yang; Xian-Mei Zhao; Zhi-Feng Sheng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.