Literature DB >> 10871911

Bone mineral density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: reference population, definition of peak bone mass, and measured site determine prevalence.

O Löfman1, L Larsson, G Toss.   

Abstract

A population-based study was performed in order to compare different definitions of peak bone mass, and to apply the corresponding T-scores for different skeletal sites to a cohort of 70-yr-old women for studying the prevalence of osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip, lumbar spine, and forearm was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic 4500) in 296 women ages 16-31 yr and 210 women age 70 yr. Peak bone mass occurred in women in their early 20s at the proximal femur and at 28 and 31 yr at the spine and forearm, respectively. BMD cutoff levels were compared to machine-specific cutoff values for the different sites. When applied to our cohort of 70-yr-old women, the prevalence of osteoporosis at the total hip was 9-25%, depending on which peak bone mass the T-score of -2.5 was based. The prevalence in the spine was 28-33% and in the forearm 45-67%. Osteoporosis in at least one of the three measured sites was documented in 49-72% of the population sample. Our results show that the use of T-score to define osteoporosis results in a highly different prevalence rate in a given population depending on the reference population and the skeletal sites chosen for measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10871911     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:3:2:177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  22 in total

1.  Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS).

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; F Bertoldo; G Bianchi; C Cepollaro; A Del Puente; S Giannini; S Gonnelli; D Maggio; C Marcocci; S Minisola; E Palummeri; M Rossini; L Sartori; L Sinigaglia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Differential skeletal impact of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in young versus old HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  Philip M Grant; Douglas Kitch; Grace A McComsey; Camlin Tierney; Belinda Ha; Todd T Brown
Journal:  HIV Clin Trials       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Incidence and causes for failure of treatment of women with proven osteoporosis.

Authors:  Noah Zafran; Zvi Liss; Ronit Peled; Michael Sherf; Haim Reuveni
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Premenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Adi Cohen
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-31).

Authors:  Chuanwen Zhou; Qianjun Li; Shushu Huang; Lu Fan; Bingjian Wang; Jian Dai; Xiaoming Tang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison between the Klemetti index and heel DXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density in the elderly.

Authors:  Anders Halling; G Rutger Persson; Johan Berglund; Owe Johansson; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Patient assessment using standardized bone mineral density values and a national reference database: implementing uniform thresholds for the reimbursement of osteoporosis treatments in Belgium.

Authors:  S Boonen; J-M Kaufman; J-Y Reginster; J-P Devogelaer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Serge C L M Cremers; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; Skorn Ponrartana; Stefano Mora; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  The aging spine: new technologies and therapeutics for the osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  Joseph M Lane; Michael J Gardner; Julie T Lin; Marjolein C van der Meulen; Elizabeth Myers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.