Literature DB >> 25365969

Panoramic measures for oral bone mass in detecting osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

E Calciolari1, N Donos2, J C Park3, A Petrie4, N Mardas2.   

Abstract

Different quantitative and qualitative indices calculated on oral panoramic radiographs have been proposed as useful tools to screen for reduced skeletal bone mineral density (BMD). Our aim was to systematically review the literature on linear and qualitative panoramic measures and to assess the accuracy of these indices by performing a meta-analysis of their sensitivity and specificity. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Fifty studies were included in the qualitative appraisal and 19 were considered for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies, assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool, was on average low. Three indices were reported by most of the studies: mandibular cortical width, panoramic mandibular index, and the Klemetti index. Mandibular cortical width presented with a better accuracy in excluding osteopenia/osteoporosis (specificity), since patients with a cortical width more than 4 mm had a normal BMD in 90% of the cases. Almost all studies used a cutoff of 0.3 for the panoramic mandibular index, resulting in an estimated sensitivity and specificity in detecting reduced BMD, respectively, of 0.723 (SE 0.160; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.352-0.926) and 0.733 (SE 0.066; 95% CI, 0.587-0.841). The presence of any kind of mandibular cortical erosion gave an estimated sensitivity and specificity in detecting reduced BMD, respectively, of 0.789 (SE 0.031; 95% CI, 0.721-0.843) and 0.562 (SE 0.047; 95% CI, 0.47-0.651) and a sensitivity and specificity in detecting osteoporosis, respectively, of 0.806 (SE 0.105; 95% CI, 0.528-0.9200) and 0.643 (SE 0.109; 95% CI, 0.417-0.820). The mandibular cortical width, panoramic mandibular index, and Klemetti index are overall useful tools that potentially could be used by dentists to screen for low BMD. Their limitations are mainly related to the experience/agreement between different operators and the different image quality and magnification of the panoramic radiographs. © International & American Associations for Dental Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone density; bone resorption; dental radiography; metabolic bone disease; panoramic radiography; pathologic bone demineralization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365969      PMCID: PMC4541087          DOI: 10.1177/0022034514554949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  51 in total

1.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Image texture in dental panoramic radiographs as a potential biomarker of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Martin G Roberts; James Graham; Hugh Devlin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Skeletal osteopenia and residual ridge resorption.

Authors:  L F Ortman; E Hausmann; R G Dunford
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group.

Authors:  E Klemetti; S Kolmakov; H Kröger
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1994-02

5.  Automated osteoporosis risk assessment by dentists: a new pathway to diagnosis.

Authors:  H Devlin; P D Allen; J Graham; R Jacobs; K Karayianni; C Lindh; P F van der Stelt; E Harrison; J E Adams; S Pavitt; K Horner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Osteoporosis and periodontitis in older subjects participating in the Swedish National Survey on Aging and Care (SNAC-Blekinge).

Authors:  Stefan Renvert; Johan Berglund; Rigmor E Persson; G Rutger Persson
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Comparison between the Klemetti index and heel DXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density in the elderly.

Authors:  Anders Halling; G Rutger Persson; Johan Berglund; Owe Johansson; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Panoramic radiomorphometric indices as reliable parameters in predicting osteoporosis.

Authors:  Soad Mansour; Ali S T AlGhamdi; Fawad Javed; Hazem Marzouk; Emad A Khan
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.378

9.  Panoramic-based mandibular indices and bone mineral density of femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae in women.

Authors:  S Marandi; A Bagherpour; M Imanimoghaddam; Mr Hatef; Ar Haghighi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-06-30

10.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  32 in total

1.  Strut analysis for osteoporosis detection model using dental panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Jae Joon Hwang; Jeong-Hee Lee; Sang-Sun Han; Young Hyun Kim; Ho-Gul Jeong; Yoon Jeong Choi; Wonse Park
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Capability of CBCT to identify patients with low bone mineral density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eliete N S Guerra; Fabiana T Almeida; Fernanda V Bezerra; Paulo T D S Figueiredo; Maria A G Silva; Graziela De Luca Canto; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; André F Leite
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Radiographic evidence of treatment with bisphosphonates.

Authors:  M L T Thayer
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Mandibular radiomorphometric parameters of women with cemento-osseous dysplasia.

Authors:  Camila Nao Kato; Sâmila G Barra; Mateus Jc Pereira; Lucas Tf Gomes; Tânia Mp Amaral; Lucas G Abreu; Cláudia B Brasileiro; Ricardo A Mesquita
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  The accuracy of panoramic radiography as a screening of bone mineral density in women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mateus Azevedo Kinalski; Noeli Boscato; Melissa Feres Damian
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Current applications and development of artificial intelligence for digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Ramadhan Hardani Putra; Chiaki Doi; Nobuhiro Yoda; Eha Renwi Astuti; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Mandibular cortical index in the screening of postmenopausal at low mineral density risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luciana Munhoz; Lucas Morita; Aline Yukari Nagai; Julia Moreira; Emiko Saito Arita
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Franciotti; M Moharrami; A Quaranta; M E Bizzoca; A Piattelli; G Aprile; V Perrotti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Mandibular cortical indices and their relation to gender and age in the cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Samir Goyushov; Erhan Dursun; Tolga Fikret Tözüm
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Dentists' knowledge about osteoporosis and their ability to identify the disease.

Authors:  Renato Vicente Ferreira; Suely Roizenblatt; Vera Lucia Szejnfeld
Journal:  Adv Rheumatol       Date:  2021-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.