Literature DB >> 16761104

On using a cancer center cancer registry to identify newly affected women eligible for hereditary breast cancer syndrome testing: practical considerations.

Tiffani A DeMarco1, Christopher A Loffredo, Marilyn L Sampilo, Kenneth P Tercyak.   

Abstract

The goals of this research were to describe the process of identifying and recruiting individuals registered with a cancer center's cancer registry who were eligible to participate in cancer genetic research. This study specifically focused on younger women with personal and family cancer histories strongly suggestive of hereditary breast cancer syndromes, as determined by genetic counselor review. Of special interest was to determine the proportion of women from minority backgrounds who were (a) identifiable in this manner and (b) interested in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer through a family cancer clinical research program. An initial query of the 292 cases of women newly affected with breast cancer and contained within the registry indicated that 124 met demographic eligibility criteria. The personal and family cancer histories of each of these women were then reviewed by a genetic counselor and the remaining, eligible patients (n = 31) were subsequently contacted by mail and telephone: approximately three-fifths (18/31) of these patients were White and two-fifths (13/31) were Black or of another racial background. Of the women who were sent one or more study-related mailings, 10% (3/31) were unreachable by telephone due to incorrect contact information, 32% (10/31) were reachable by telephone but unresponsive to messages left, 26% (8/31) had already participated in the family cancer program (i.e., were positive controls), 6% (2/31) were interested in participating in the program, 23% (7/31) were uninterested in participating in the program, and 3% (1/31) were later determined to be ineligible. Comparing the racial backgrounds of women who were either positive controls or interested in participating (i.e., "tester" category) to women who were either unreachable, nonresponsive, uninterested, or ineligible (i.e., "nontester" category), there was a nonsignificant trend for more non-White women to fall into the nontester than tester category, Fisher's Exact Test = .09. This work underscores practical steps in planning and carrying-out cancer genetic testing research among women newly affected with breast cancer and members of special populations. It also underscores the role that genetic counseling professionals play in this process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16761104     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-9006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  22 in total

Review 1.  Minority recruitment in hereditary breast cancer research.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes; Susan K Peterson; Amelie Ramirez; Kipling J Gallion; Paige Green McDonald; Celette Sugg Skinner; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Hereditary cancer: guidelines in clinical practice--general overview.

Authors:  P A Daly
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Why cancer centers matter.

Authors:  Judith C Gasson
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  Using a population-based cancer registry for recruitment of newly diagnosed patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Tom Schroeder; Marcia Gaul; Carol Moinpour; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  G Parmigiani; D Berry; O Aguilar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Decision making with uncertain information: learning from women in a high risk breast cancer clinic.

Authors:  Caren J Frost; Vickie Venne; Dianne Cunningham; Ruth Gerritsen-McKane
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Prevalence of recurring BRCA mutations among Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Robson; M K Dabney; G Rosenthal; S Ludwig; M H Seltzer; T Gilewski; B Haas; M Osborne; L Norton; F Gilbert; K Offit
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  1997

8.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Jeffrey R Botkin; Mary Daly; Eric T Juengst; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jon F Merz; Rebecca Pentz; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Jeremy Sugarman; Lisa R Susswein; Sharon F Terry; Melissa A Austin; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The NCI's Cancer Centers Program: past, present, and future.

Authors:  R J Steckel
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1985
View more
  2 in total

1.  Problem-solving skills training in adult cancer survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC pilot study.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Alaina L Zapf; Rachel M Depner; Tessa Flores; Alissa Huston; Hani H Rashid; Demetria McNeal; Louis S Constine; Fergal J Fleming; Gregory E Wilding; Olle Jane Z Sahler
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2022-03-25

2.  Information needs of mothers regarding communicating BRCA1/2 cancer genetic test results to their children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.