Literature DB >> 15587665

Lubberts effect in columnar phosphors.

Aldo Badano1, Robert M Gagne, Brandon D Gallas, Robert J Jennings, Jonathan S Boswell, Kyle J Myers.   

Abstract

Noise transfer in granular x-ray imaging phosphor screens is not proportional to the square of the magnitude of the signal transfer when the transfer properties are considered for the entire screen thickness, unless appropriately weighted at each depth of interaction. This property, known as the Lubberts effect, has not yet been studied in columnar structured screens because of a lack of a generalized description of the depth-dependent light transport. In this paper, we investigate the signal and noise transfer characteristics of columnar phosphors used in digital mammography detectors using DETECT-II, an optical Monte Carlo light transport simulation code. We first validate our choice of optical parameters for the description of granular and columnar screens using published normalized modulation transfer (MTF) experimental data. Our calculations of MTF match empirically measured MTFs for a granular film/screen analog system, and for an indirect x-ray digital imaging system with CsI:Tl screen representative of digital mammography systems. Using the depth-dependent spread functions and collection efficiencies, we calculate the signal and noise transfer functions and the Lubberts fraction, which is the ratio of the signal transfer function to the noise transfer function, for different screen thicknesses of granular and columnar phosphors. We find that the Lubberts fraction of a 85 microm granular screen model corresponding to a Gd2O2S:Tb screen is similar to the fraction for a 100 microm columnar CsI:Tl screen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15587665     DOI: 10.1118/1.1796151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Back-irradiated and dual-screen sandwich detector configurations for radiography.

Authors:  Anthony R Lubinsky; Adrian Howansky; Hao Zheng; Wei Zhao
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-07-09

2.  Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd2 O2 S:Tb indirect flat panel detector x-ray imaging performance in front- and back-irradiation geometries.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; Anastasiia Mishchenko; A R Lubinsky; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  An apparatus and method for directly measuring the depth-dependent gain and spatial resolution of turbid scintillators.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; A R Lubinsky; Katsuhiko Suzuki; S Ghose; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Rapid Monte Carlo simulation of detector DQE(f).

Authors:  Josh Star-Lack; Mingshan Sun; Andre Meyer; Daniel Morf; Dragos Constantin; Rebecca Fahrig; Eric Abel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.

Authors:  Qian Cao; Alejandro Sisniega; Michael Brehler; J Webster Stayman; John Yorkston; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Wojciech Zbijewski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Deriving depth-dependent light escape efficiency and optical Swank factor from measured pulse height spectra of scintillators.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; Boyu Peng; Anthony R Lubinsky; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Modelling the transport of optical photons in scintillation detectors for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Analogous Lubberts effect in photon counting detectors.

Authors:  Ke Li
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.