Literature DB >> 15586278

Chronostasis without voluntary action.

Iona Alexander1, Kai V Thilo, Alan Cowey, Vincent Walsh.   

Abstract

In a previous study we explored auditory chronostasis and suggested an arousal account of this temporal illusion rather than one dependent on backdating actions to the onset of a motor event. Here we present three experiments designed to distinguish between two competing accounts of the mechanisms underlying the illusion. Experiment 1 investigated whether voluntary movements are necessary for the illusion to occur. Experiment 2 sought to clarify whether auditory chronostasis occurs when the intervals to be judged are continuous (temporally contiguous) rather than separate events. Experiment 3 was designed to establish whether increased task demands account for the illusion. Together the results from these experiments show that chronostasis is an illusion that is not dependent on voluntary action, can occur without a change in the spatial location of the stimulus (thus precluding an account based on spatial attention), occurs with discrete as well as continuous events, and is affected by the salience of the termination of the event to be timed rather than the onset. Collectively these findings suggest that the mechanisms underlying chronostasis are best explained by an arousal hypothesis since neither attention nor backdating to action can account for the commonalities between chronostasis in the auditory, visual and tactile domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15586278     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2054-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Illusory perceptions of space and time preserve cross-saccadic perceptual continuity.

Authors:  K Yarrow; P Haggard; R Heal; P Brown; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Increased variability of paced finger tapping accuracy following repetitive magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in humans.

Authors:  H Théoret; J Haque; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Auditory chronostasis: hanging on the telephone.

Authors:  Iona Hodinott-Hill; Kai V Thilo; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Manual chronostasis: tactile perception precedes physical contact.

Authors:  Kielan Yarrow; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Perceptual timing in cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  P Nichelli; D Alway; J Grafman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution.

Authors:  R B Ivry; S W Keele; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Cerebellar timing systems.

Authors:  R Ivry
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.230

8.  On dopaminergic modulation of temporal information processing.

Authors:  T H Rammsayer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Duration illusions in a train of visual stimuli.

Authors:  D Rose; J Summers
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963
View more
  7 in total

1.  Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James V M Hanson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  The origins and structure of quantitative concepts.

Authors:  Cory D Bonn; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Spatio-temporal contingency of saccade-induced chronostasis.

Authors:  Karsten Georg; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Psychological and neural mechanisms of subjective time dilation.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Marc Wittmann; A D Bud Craig; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Temporal perception in visual processing as a research tool.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Ting Zhang; Lihua Mao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-24

6.  The effect of predictability on subjective duration.

Authors:  Vani Pariyadath; David Eagleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Temporal binding of interval markers.

Authors:  Christina Derichs; Eckart Zimmermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.