Literature DB >> 8577576

Duration illusions in a train of visual stimuli.

D Rose1, J Summers.   

Abstract

The first stimulus in a sequential train of identical flashes of light appears to last longer than those in the middle of the train. Four flashes (each 600 or 667 ms) were presented and the first was shortened until it appeared to have the same duration as that of the next. The duration of the first stimulus was found to be overestimated by about 50%. The illusion was unaffected by stimulus contrast, size, or interflash interval (between 100 and 600 ms). For some subjects, the last stimulus in the train also appeared to be about 50% longer than the penultimate flash. The results are discussed in terms of theories of how attention, arousal, and stimulus processing can affect duration perception. The mechanisms activated are peculiar to the visual system, since no similar illusion of duration was consistently experienced with a train of auditory tones.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8577576     DOI: 10.1068/p241177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  36 in total

1.  Voluntary action expands perceived duration of its sensory consequence.

Authors:  Junghyun Park; Madeleine Schlag-Rey; John Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Spatial maps for time and motion.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Morrone; Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation.

Authors:  Ming Bo Cai; David M Eagleman; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Situational context is important: perceptual grouping modulates temporal perception.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Shaojuan Yang; Ting Zhang; Xin Zhang; Lihua Mao
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

5.  Chronostasis without voluntary action.

Authors:  Iona Alexander; Kai V Thilo; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A common processing system for duration, order and spatial information: evidence from a time estimation task.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Fausta Cinque; Anna Maria Barbarulo; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.

Authors:  David Burr; Martin S Banks; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Brief subjective durations contract with repetition.

Authors:  Vani Pariyadath; David M Eagleman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.