Literature DB >> 20584179

Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing.

James Heron1, Neil W Roach, David Whitaker, James V M Hanson.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests than human time perception is likely to reflect an ensemble of recent temporal experience. For example, prolonged exposure to consistent temporal patterns can adaptively realign the perception of event order, both within and between sensory modalities (e.g. Fujisaki et al., 2004 Nat. Neurosci., 7, 773-778). In addition, the observation that 'a watched pot never boils' serves to illustrate the fact that dynamic shifts in our attentional state can also produce marked distortions in our temporal estimates. In the current study we provide evidence for a hitherto unknown link between adaptation, temporal perception and our attentional state. We show that our ability to use recent sensory history as a perceptual baseline for ongoing temporal judgments is subject to striking top-down modulation via shifts in the observer's selective attention. Specifically, attending to the temporal structure of asynchronous auditory and visual adapting stimuli generates a substantial increase in the temporal recalibration induced by these stimuli. We propose a conceptual framework accounting for our findings whereby attention modulates the perceived salience of temporal patterns. This heightened salience allows the formation of audiovisual perceptual 'objects', defined solely by their temporal structure. Repeated exposure to these objects induces high-level pattern adaptation effects, akin to those found in visual and auditory domains (e.g. Leopold & Bondar (2005) Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High-Level Vision. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 189-211; Schweinberger et al. (2008) Curr. Biol., 18, 684-688).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20584179      PMCID: PMC3362737          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  73 in total

1.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to illusory lines.

Authors:  Leila Montaser-Kouhsari; Reza Rajimehr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments.

Authors:  Amy Rezec; Bart Krekelberg; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.

Authors:  James V M Hanson; James Heron; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Decoding of temporal intervals from cortical ensemble activity.

Authors:  Mikhail A Lebedev; Joseph E O'Doherty; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The perceptual fate of letters in two kinds of apparent movement displays.

Authors:  J T Petersik
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-08

6.  Time perception and attention: the effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.

Authors:  S W Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-08

7.  Simple and contingent aftereffects of perceived duration in vision and audition.

Authors:  J T Walker; A L Irion; D G Gordon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-05

8.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963

9.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.

Authors:  Waka Fujisaki; Shinsuke Shimojo; Makio Kashino; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-13       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments.

Authors:  Argiro Vatakis; Jordi Navarra; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  23 in total

1.  A neural hierarchy for illusions of time: duration adaptation precedes multisensory integration.

Authors:  James Heron; John Hotchkiss; Craig Aaen-Stockdale; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Multisensory simultaneity recalibration: storage of the aftereffect in the absence of counterevidence.

Authors:  Tonja-Katrin Machulla; Massimiliano Di Luca; Eva Froehlich; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Audiovisual time perception is spatially specific.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; James V M Hanson; Paul V McGraw; David Whitaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-28

5.  Spatial modulation of motor-sensory recalibration in early deaf individuals.

Authors:  Tiziana Vercillo; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Audio-Visual Temporal Recalibration Can be Constrained by Content Cues Regardless of Spatial Overlap.

Authors:  Warrick Roseboom; Takahiro Kawabe; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-24

9.  The Build-Up and Transfer of Sensorimotor Temporal Recalibration Measured via a Synchronization Task.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-12

10.  Interval timing in children: effects of auditory and visual pacing stimuli and relationships with reading and attention variables.

Authors:  Emma E Birkett; Joel B Talcott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.