Literature DB >> 12401174

Auditory chronostasis: hanging on the telephone.

Iona Hodinott-Hill1, Kai V Thilo, Alan Cowey, Vincent Walsh.   

Abstract

The perception of time can be illusory: we have all waited anxiously for important seconds to tick away slowly at the end of a football game and have experienced the truth of the adage "time flies when you're having fun." One illusion of time experience that has recently been investigated, the apparent slowing of the movement of the second hand on the clock when one first looks at it, has been termed "chronostasis," and it has been suggested that the effect is unique to vision and is dependent on eye movements. We sought to test whether the effect is really unique to vision or whether it can also be produced with auditory stimuli. Subjects were asked to judge the length of a silent gap between two tones presented through headphones. When the tones were presented to one ear, subjects judged the duration of the gap veridically. When subjects were required to shift concentration from one ear to the other, however, the judgement of time showed that the auditory system is also susceptible to chronostasis. We suggest that this generalization of chronostasis to another sensory system is consistent with theories of time perception that emphasize a single, multimodal clock for duration estimation rather than a mechanism that is dependent on motor acts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12401174     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01219-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  22 in total

1.  Chronostasis without voluntary action.

Authors:  Iona Alexander; Kai V Thilo; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A common processing system for duration, order and spatial information: evidence from a time estimation task.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Fausta Cinque; Anna Maria Barbarulo; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

6.  What Color Was It? A Psychophysical Paradigm for Tracking Subjective Progress in Continuous Tasks.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Binding space and time through action.

Authors:  N Binetti; N Hagura; C Fadipe; A Tomassini; V Walsh; S Bestmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Consistent chronostasis effects across saccade categories imply a subcortical efferent trigger.

Authors:  Kielan Yarrow; Helen Johnson; Patrick Haggard; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Human time perception and its illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  How voluntary actions modulate time perception.

Authors:  Dorit Wenke; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.