Literature DB >> 11403950

Increased variability of paced finger tapping accuracy following repetitive magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in humans.

H Théoret1, J Haque, A Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

Imaging and lesion studies suggest that the cerebellum is involved in the self-generation of timed motor responses. Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we studied the effects of transient disruption of the lateral or medial cerebellum on a paced-finger-tapping task (PFT). Results show greater variability on the PFT task following a 5 min train of 1 Hz rTMS to the medial cerebellum. Magnetic stimulation of the lateral cerebellum or motor cortex, and sham stimulation, had no effect on performance. Expanding the results of neuroimaging studies, these data show the causal link between activity in the medial cerebellum and the production of timed movements. This is the first demonstration of the feasibility of transiently disrupting the cerebellum by rTMS and inducing behavioral effects. This method of 'virtual lesions' can expand the study of the role of the cerebellum in motor control and cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11403950     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01860-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  59 in total

1.  Is the cerebellum a potential target for stimulation in Parkinson's disease? Results of 1-Hz rTMS on upper limb motor tasks.

Authors:  Eduard Minks; Radek Mareček; Tomáš Pavlík; Petra Ovesná; Martin Bareš
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Slowing fastest finger movements of the dominant hand with low-frequency rTMS of the hand area of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  L Jäncke; H Steinmetz; S Benilow; U Ziemann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is essential in time reproduction: an investigation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Catherine R G Jones; Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell; Marjan Jahanshahi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets.

Authors:  Janine D Bijsterbosch; Anthony T Barker; Kwang-Hyuk Lee; P W R Woodruff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Effects of cerebellar stimulation on processing semantic associations.

Authors:  Giorgos P Argyropoulos; Neil G Muggleton
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 6.  Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Cerebellar TMS evokes a long latency motor response in the hand during a visually guided manual tracking task.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Kenichi Horino; Atsuko Yagura; Akiyoshi Matsugi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Chronostasis without voluntary action.

Authors:  Iona Alexander; Kai V Thilo; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Michail Doumas; Peter Praamstra; Alan M Wing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Modulation of steady-state auditory evoked potentials by cerebellar rTMS.

Authors:  Maria A Pastor; Gregor Thut; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.