Literature DB >> 15565319

Multi-detector row computed tomography of the heart: does a multi-segment reconstruction algorithm improve left ventricular volume measurements?

Kai Uwe Juergens1, David Maintz, Matthias Grude, Jan M Boese, Britta Heimes, Eva Maria Fallenberg, Walter Heindel, Roman Fischbach.   

Abstract

A multi-segment cardiac image reconstruction algorithm in multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) was evaluated regarding temporal resolution and determination of left ventricular (LV) volumes and global LV function. MDCT and cine magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were performed in 12 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Patients gave informed written consent for the MDCT and the CMR exam. MDCT data were reconstructed using the standard adaptive cardiac volume (ACV) algorithm as well as a multi-segment algorithm utilizing data from three, five and seven rotations. LV end-diastolic (LV-EDV) and end-systolic volumes and ejection fraction (LV-EF) were determined from short-axis image reformations and compared to CMR data. Mean temporal resolution achieved was 192+/-24 ms using the ACV algorithm and improved significantly utilizing the three, five and seven data segments to 139+/-12, 113+/-13 and 96+/-11 ms (P<0.001 for each). Mean LV-EDV was without significant differences using the ACV algorithm, the multi-segment approach and CMR imaging. Despite improved temporal resolution with multi-segment image reconstruction, end-systolic volumes were less accurately measured (mean differences 3.9+/-11.8 ml to 8.1+/-13.9 ml), resulting in a consistent underestimation of LV-EF by 2.3-5.4% in comparison to CMR imaging (Bland-Altman analysis). Multi-segment image reconstruction improves temporal resolution compared to the standard ACV algorithm, but this does not result in a benefit for determination of LV volume and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15565319     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2530-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Quantification of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance images acquired in real time.

Authors:  R M Setser; S E Fischer; C H Lorenz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Martijn S Dirksen; Jeroen J Bax; Albert de Roos; J Wouter Jukema; Rob J van der Geest; Koos Geleijns; Eric Boersma; Ernst E van der Wall; Hildo J Lamb
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Kai Uwe Juergens; Matthias Grude; David Maintz; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Wichter; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  [Quantification of cardiac function with multislice spiral CT using retrospective EKG-gating: comparison with MRI].

Authors:  A H Mahnken; E Spüntrup; J E Wildberger; M Heuschmid; M Niethammer; A M Sinha; T Flohr; A Bücker; R W Günther
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-01

5.  [Left ventricular functional parameters using ECG-gated multidetector spiral CT in comparison with invasive ventriculography].

Authors:  M Heuschmid; A Küttner; S Schröder; B Trebar; C Burgstahler; A Mahnken; M Niethammer; T Trabold; A F Kopp; C D Claussen
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-10

6.  Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Matthias Grude; Kai Uwe Juergens; Thomas Wichter; Matthias Paul; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Joachim Georg Muller; Walter Heindel; Guenter Breithardt; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Computed tomography of the heart: ECG-gated and continuous scans.

Authors:  K Lackner; P Thurn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Prevalence and mortality rate of congestive heart failure in the United States.

Authors:  D D Schocken; M I Arrieta; P E Leaverton; E A Ross
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  In vivo validation of cardiac spiral computed tomography using retrospective gating.

Authors:  Jörg Albers; Jan M Boese; Christian F Vahl; Siegfried Hagl
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  14 in total

1.  Assessment of global function of left ventricle with dual-source CT in patients with severe arrhythmia: a comparison with the use of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Joon Suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Authors:  Martin Heuschmid; Julia K Rothfuss; Stephen Schroeder; Michael Fenchel; Norbert Stauder; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas Franow; Ronald S Kuzo; Axel Kuettner; Stephan Miller; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Left ventricular function studied with MDCT.

Authors:  Kai Uwe Juergens; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of a semiautomatic software tool for left ventricular function analysis with 16-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Mira Müller; Florian Teige; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Mutidetector-row CT and quantitative gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular function in small hearts: the cardiac physical phantom study using a combined SPECT/CT system.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seiji Tomiguchi; Kazuo Awai; Shinya Shiraishi; Takeshi Nakaura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Assessment of regional left ventricular function with multidetector-row computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roman Fischbach; Kai Uwe Juergens; Murat Ozgun; David Maintz; Matthias Grude; Harald Seifarth; Walter Heindel; Thomas Wichter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bénédicte Belge; Emmanuel Coche; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment by dual-source computed tomography compared with MRI.

Authors:  Pieter A van der Vleuten; Gonda J de Jonge; Daniël D Lubbers; René A Tio; Tineke P Willems; Matthijs Oudkerk; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Comparison of global left ventricular function using 20 phases with 10-phase reconstructions in multidetector-row computed tomography.

Authors:  Yeon-jee Ko; Song Soo Kim; Woon-Ju Park; Jin-Ok Jeong; Sung Min Ko
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Multidetector row computed tomography evaluation of the micropig kidney as a potential renal donor.

Authors:  Woong Yoon; Min Young Lee; Jung Min Ryu; Yong Ju Moon; Sang Hun Lee; Jae Hong Park; Seung Pil Yun; Min Woo Jang; Sung Su Park; Ho Jae Han
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.