Literature DB >> 18704432

Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment by dual-source computed tomography compared with MRI.

Pieter A van der Vleuten1, Gonda J de Jonge, Daniël D Lubbers, René A Tio, Tineke P Willems, Matthijs Oudkerk, Felix Zijlstra.   

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) function assessment by dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) was compared with the reference standard method using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Accurate assessment of LV function is essential for the prediction of prognosis in cardiac disease. Thirty-four patients undergoing DSCT examination of the heart for various clinical indications underwent MRI after DSCT. Short-axis cine images were reconstructed from the DSCT datasets and were analyzed using a dedicated post-processing software-tool to generate global left ventricular function parameters. Five DSCT datasets were considered to be of insufficient image quality. DSCT showed a small overestimation of end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes of 11.0 ml and 3.5 ml, respectively. Myocardial mass assessed by DSCT showed an average underestimation of 0.2 g. DSCT showed a small overestimation of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 0.4%-point with a Bland-Altman interval of [-8.67 (0.40) 9.48]. Global LV functional parameters calculated from DSCT datasets acquired in daily clinical practice correlated well with MRI and may be considered interchangeable. However, visual assessment of the image quality of the short-axis cine slices should be performed to detect any artifacts in the DSCT data which could influence accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18704432     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1138-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literature.

Authors:  P A van der Vleuten; T P Willems; M J W Götte; R A Tio; M J W Greuter; F Zijlstra; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Comparison of multidetector computed tomography and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography for left ventricular assessment in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Javed Butler; Michael D Shapiro; Davinder S Jassal; Davindar Jassal; Tomas G Neilan; Tomas Neilan; John Nichols; Maros Ferencik; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann; Ricardo C Cury
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings.

Authors:  S Busch; T R C Johnson; B J Wintersperger; N Minaifar; A Bhargava; C Rist; M F Reiser; C Becker; K Nikolaou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dual-source CT with improved temporal resolution in assessment of left ventricular function: a pilot study.

Authors:  Harald Brodoefel; Ulrich Kramer; Anja Reimann; Christof Burgstahler; Stephen Schroeder; Andreas Kopp; Martin Heuschmid
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  L J M Kroft; A de Roos; J Geleijns
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Dual-source computed tomography for assessing cardiac function: a phantom study.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Herbert Bruder; Christoph Suess; Georg Mühlenbruch; Philipp Bruners; Christian Hohl; Rolf W Guenther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Prognostic significance of progression of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A Moise; M G Bourassa; P Théroux; Y Taeymans; A Pasternac; L Campeau; M A Bois; I Dyrda; P R David
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry.

Authors:  M Emond; M B Mock; K B Davis; L D Fisher; D R Holmes; B R Chaitman; G C Kaiser; E Alderman; T Killip
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

1.  Automatic vs semi-automatic global cardiac function assessment using 64-row CT.

Authors:  J Greupner; E Zimmermann; B Hamm; M Dewey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dual source computed tomography: automated, visual or dual analysis?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass.

Authors:  Aksuyek S Celebi; Hulya Yalcin; Fatih Yalcin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.062

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.