OBJECTIVE: To assess functional parameters using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and echocardiography and to compare the results with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: End-diastolic-volume (EDV), end-systolic-volume (ESV), stroke-volume (SV), ejection-fraction (EF), and myocardial mass (MM) were calculated based on CT data sets from 52 patients. Echocardiography was performed in 24 of the 52 patients. The results from MDCT and echocardiography were compared with MRI. RESULTS: A strong correlation between MDCT and MRI (r=0.66-0.90) was found for all parameters. Echocardiography revealed a low or moderate correlation (0.05-0.59). Compared to MRI the average differences with MDCT were for EDV 15.1 ml, ESV 10.6 ml, SV 4.5 ml, EF 1.8%, and MM 8.2 g, for EDV determined by echocardiography 36.2 ml, ESV 6.8 ml, and EF 13.9%. Bland-Altman analysis revealed acceptable limits of agreement between MRI and MDCT. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT enables reliable quantification of left ventricular function. Echocardiography was found to have only a moderate agreement of functional parameters with MRI.
OBJECTIVE: To assess functional parameters using multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and echocardiography and to compare the results with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: End-diastolic-volume (EDV), end-systolic-volume (ESV), stroke-volume (SV), ejection-fraction (EF), and myocardial mass (MM) were calculated based on CT data sets from 52 patients. Echocardiography was performed in 24 of the 52 patients. The results from MDCT and echocardiography were compared with MRI. RESULTS: A strong correlation between MDCT and MRI (r=0.66-0.90) was found for all parameters. Echocardiography revealed a low or moderate correlation (0.05-0.59). Compared to MRI the average differences with MDCT were for EDV 15.1 ml, ESV 10.6 ml, SV 4.5 ml, EF 1.8%, and MM 8.2 g, for EDV determined by echocardiography 36.2 ml, ESV 6.8 ml, and EF 13.9%. Bland-Altman analysis revealed acceptable limits of agreement between MRI and MDCT. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT enables reliable quantification of left ventricular function. Echocardiography was found to have only a moderate agreement of functional parameters with MRI.
Authors: J A Rumberger; T Behrenbeck; M R Bell; J F Breen; D L Johnston; D R Holmes; M Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Andreas H Mahnken; Ralf Koos; Marcus Katoh; Elmar Spuentrup; Petra Busch; Joachim E Wildberger; Harald P Kühl; Rolf W Günther Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-01-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Palumbo; E Maffei; C Martini; G Messalli; S Seitun; R Malagò; A Aldrovandi; E Emiliano; A Cuttone; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Roman Fischbach; Kai Uwe Juergens; Murat Ozgun; David Maintz; Matthias Grude; Harald Seifarth; Walter Heindel; Thomas Wichter Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-09-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael Puesken; Roman Fischbach; Mirja Wenker; Harald Seifarth; David Maintz; Walter Heindel; Kai Uwe Juergens Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 5.315