Literature DB >> 19526237

Optimization of time-of-flight reconstruction on Philips GEMINI TF.

Stefaan Vandenberghe1, Larry van Elmbt, Michel Guerchaft, Enrico Clementel, Jeroen Verhaeghe, Anne Bol, Ignace Lemahieu, Max Lonneux.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to optimize different parameters in the time-of-flight (TOF) reconstruction for the Philips GEMINI TF. The use of TOF in iterative reconstruction introduces additional variables to be optimized compared to conventional PET reconstruction. The different parameters studied are the TOF kernel width, the kernel truncation (used to reduce reconstruction time) and the scatter correction method.
METHODS: These parameters are optimized using measured phantom studies. All phantom studies were acquired with a very high number of counts to limit the effects of noise. A high number of iterations (33 subsets and 3 iterations) was used to reach convergence. The figures of merit are the uniformity in the background, the cold spot recovery and the hot spot contrast. As reference results we used the non-TOF reconstruction of the same data sets.
RESULTS: It is shown that contrast recovery loss can only be avoided if the kernel is extended to more than 3 standard deviations. To obtain uniform reconstructions the recommended scatter correction is TOF single scatter simulation (SSS). This also leads to improved cold spot recovery and hot spot contrast. While the daily measurements of the system show a timing resolution in the range of 590–600 ps, the optimal reconstructions are obtained with a TOF kernel full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 650–700 ps. The optimal kernel width seems to be less critical for the recovered contrast but has an important effect on the background uniformity. Using smaller or wider kernels results in a less uniform background and reduced hot and cold contrast recovery.
CONCLUSION: The different parameters studied have a large effect on the quantitative accuracy of the reconstructed images. The optimal settings from this study can be used as a guideline to make an objective comparison of the gains obtained with TOF PET versus PET reconstruction.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19526237     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1164-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  19 in total

1.  Three-dimensional PET reconstruction with time-of-flight measurement.

Authors:  A Mallon; P Grangeat
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Image quality assessment of LaBr3-based whole-body 3D PET scanners: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp; G Muehllehner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Fourier rebinning of time-of-flight PET data.

Authors:  Michel Defrise; Michael E Casey; Christian Michel; Maurizio Conti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Small nodule detectability evaluation using a generalized scan-statistic model.

Authors:  Lucreţiu M Popescu; Robert M Lewitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Fast reconstruction of 3D time-of-flight PET data by axial rebinning and transverse mashing.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Robert M Lewitt; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  PET camera performance design evaluation for BGO and BaF2 scintillators (non-time-of-flight).

Authors:  W H Wong
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET.

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Photon time-of-flight-assisted positron emission tomography.

Authors:  M M Ter-Pogossian; N A Mullani; D C Ficke; J Markham; D L Snyder
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Feasibility of time-of-flight reconstruction in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  N A Mullani; J Markham; M M Ter-Pogossian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Optimization of a fully 3D single scatter simulation algorithm for 3D PET.

Authors:  Roberto Accorsi; Lars-Eric Adam; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  3 in total

1.  A NIM PET/CT phantom for evaluating the PET image quality of micro-lesions and the performance parameters of CT.

Authors:  Shujie Lu; Peng Zhang; Chengwei Li; Jie Sun; Wenli Liu; Pu Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.

Authors:  Takafumi Taniguchi; Go Akamatsu; Yukiko Kasahara; Katsuhiko Mitsumoto; Shingo Baba; Yuji Tsutsui; Kazuhiko Himuro; Shohei Mikasa; Daisuke Kidera; Masayuki Sasaki
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  Recent developments in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  S Vandenberghe; E Mikhaylova; E D'Hoe; P Mollet; J S Karp
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2016-02-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.