Literature DB >> 15551087

Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Leia B Bagesteiro1, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that training of a novel task can improve subsequent performance in the opposite arm owing to anticipation of the previously learned task conditions. Interestingly, we recently reported preliminary evidence that such transfer might also include modulation of feedback-mediated responses. We now test interlimb transfer of load compensation responses, measured through kinematic and EMG recordings during rapid 20 degrees elbow flexion movements. Two subject groups, LR and RL, each comprising six right-handed subjects, first performed using either the left (LR) or right (RL) arm, followed by opposite arm performance. After 30 trials of consistent performance, five random trials within a background of 50 trials were loaded with a 2-kg mass prior to the "go" signal. We compared load compensation responses for naive performance with those following opposite arm exposure. Under naive conditions, the resulting load compensation responses began about 50 ms following movement onset, and were substantially more effective for the nondominant arm. Opposite arm exposure substantially improved the accuracy of only dominant arm responses. This, however, did not occur through changes in the short latency components of the load compensation response. Instead, changes in muscle activities, associated with interlimb transfer, began some 150 ms following movement onset. We expect that these changes represent transfer in the "volitional" component of the load compensation response. Because the shorter latency response was unaffected by opposite arm exposure, modulation of this component likely requires prior experience with limb specific effectors.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15551087     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2055-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Mirror Writing: Learning, Transfer, and Implications for Internal Inverse Models.

Authors:  Mark L. Latash
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Inter- and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching.

Authors:  S M Morton; C E Lang; A J Bastian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  EMG responses to an unexpected load in fast movements are delayed with an increase in the expected movement time.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Gerald L Gottlieb; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information.

Authors:  J I Laszlo; R A Baguley; P J Bairstow
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography.

Authors:  P W Hodges; B H Bui
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-12

7.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Proprioception during voluntary movement.

Authors:  A Prochazka
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Catching a ball: contributions of intrinsic muscle stiffness, reflexes, and higher order responses.

Authors:  D J Bennett; M Gorassini; A Prochazka
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Some factors pertinent to the organization and control of arm movements.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting; C A Terzuolo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  11 in total

1.  Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Coordinate processing during the left-to-right hand transfer investigated by EEG.

Authors:  Regine K Lange; Christoph Braun; Ben Godde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Jeng-Feng Yang; John P Scholz; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Generalization of gait adaptation for fall prevention: from moveable platform to slippery floor.

Authors:  T Bhatt; Y C Pai
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Kinematic and kinetic evidence for functional lateralization in a symmetrical motor task: the water polo eggbeater kick.

Authors:  Nuno Oliveira; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dynamic dominance persists during unsupported reaching.

Authors:  Tucker Tomlinson; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Segregated and overlapping neural circuits exist for the production of static and dynamic precision grip force.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Stephen A Coombes; Peggy J Planetta; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Immediate and latent interlimb transfer of gait stability adaptation following repeated exposure to slips.

Authors:  T Bhatt; Y-C Pai
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Philippe Boulinguez; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.