Literature DB >> 9020824

A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography.

P W Hodges1, B H Bui.   

Abstract

Little consensus exists in the literature regarding methods for determination of the onset of electromyographic (EMG) activity. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracy of a range of computer-based techniques with respect to EMG onset determined visually by an experienced examiner. Twenty-seven methods were compared which varied in terms of EMG processing (low pass filtering at 10, 50 and 500 Hz), threshold value (1, 2 and 3 SD beyond mean of baseline activity) and the number of samples for which the mean must exceed the defined threshold (20, 50 and 100 ms). Three hundred randomly selected trials of a postural task were evaluated using each technique. The visual determination of EMG onset was found to be highly repeatable between days. Linear regression equations were calculated for the values selected by each computer method which indicated that the onset values selected by the majority of the parameter combinations deviated significantly from the visually derived onset values. Several methods accurately selected the time of onset of EMG activity and are recommended for future use.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9020824     DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(96)95190-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  185 in total

1.  Experimental muscle pain changes feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; G Lorimer Moseley; Anna Gabrielsson; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement of the upper body and muscle activity patterns following a rapidly applied load: the influence of pre-load alterations.

Authors:  T Bull Andersen; M Essendrop; B Schibye
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison of hip and knee strength and neuromuscular activity in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Lori A Bolgla; Terry R Malone; Brian R Umberger; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

4.  The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effects of Tai Chi on pre-landing muscle response latency during stepping down while performing a concurrent mental task in older adults.

Authors:  William W N Tsang; Christina W Y Hui-Chan; Siu N Fu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Corticomotor control of deep abdominal muscles in chronic low back pain and anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Hugo Massé-Alarie; Véronique H Flamand; Hélène Moffet; Cyril Schneider
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Teager-Kaiser energy operator signal conditioning improves EMG onset detection.

Authors:  Stanislaw Solnik; Patrick Rider; Ken Steinweg; Paul DeVita; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  The effect of sex and chronic low back pain on back muscle reflex responses.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Robert Forget; Roger Vadeboncoeur; Martin Bilodeau; Hakim Mecheri
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Electromyography of pelvic floor muscles with true differential versus faux differential electrode configuration.

Authors:  Claudia Ballmer; Patric Eichelberger; Monika Leitner; Helene Moser; Helena Luginbuehl; Annette Kuhn; Lorenz Radlinger
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Assessment of Carbon/Salt/Adhesive Electrodes for Surface Electromyography Measurements.

Authors:  Hugo Posada-Quintero; Ryan Rood; Ken Burnham; John Pennace; Ki Chon
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.