Literature DB >> 14724262

EMG responses to an unexpected load in fast movements are delayed with an increase in the expected movement time.

Mark B Shapiro1, Gerald L Gottlieb, Daniel M Corcos.   

Abstract

When moving an object, the motor system estimates the dynamic properties of the object and then controls the movement using a combination of predictive feedforward control and proprioceptive feedback. In this study, we examined how the feedforward and proprioceptive feedback processes depend on the expected movement task. Subjects made fast elbow flexion movements from an initial position to a target. The experimental protocol included movements made over a short and a long distance against an expected light or heavy inertial load. In each task in a few randomly chosen trials, a motor applied an unexpected viscous load that produced a velocity error, defined as the difference between the expected and unexpected velocities, and electromyographic (EMG) responses. The EMG responses appeared not earlier than 170-250 ms from the agonist EMG onset. Our main finding is that the onset of the EMG responses was correlated with the expected time of peak velocity, which increased for longer distances and larger loads. An analysis of the latency of the EMG responses with respect to the velocity error suggested that the EMG responses were due to segmental reflexes. We conclude that segmental reflex gains are centrally modulated with the time course dependent on the expected movement task. According to this view, the control of fast point-to-point movement is feedforward from the agonist EMG onset until the expected time of peak velocity after which the segmental reflex feedback is briefly facilitated.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14724262     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00966.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets.

Authors:  C Minos Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Absence of equifinality of hand position in a double-step unloading task.

Authors:  Nahid Norouzi-Gheidari; Philippe Archambault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Load knowledge reduces rapid force production and muscle activation during maximal-effort concentric lifts.

Authors:  J L Hernández-Davó; R Sabido; M Moya-Ramón; A J Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptation to a novel multi-force environment.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Paul A DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Chuanxin M Niu; Cynthia Poon; Fabian J David; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor lateralization is characterized by a serial hybrid control scheme.

Authors:  V Yadav; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Isoinertial Eccentric-Overload Training in Young Soccer Players: Effects on Strength, Sprint, Change of Direction, Agility and Soccer Shooting Precision.

Authors:  Giovanni Fiorilli; Intrieri Mariano; Enzo Iuliano; Arrigo Giombini; Antonello Ciccarelli; Andrea Buonsenso; Giuseppe Calcagno; Alessandra di Cagno
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Discordant Tasks and Motor Adjustments Affect Interactions between Adaptations to Altered Kinematics and Dynamics.

Authors:  Fritzie Arce; Itai Novick; Eilon Vaadia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  EMG responses to unexpected perturbations are delayed in slower movements.

Authors:  Fabian J David; Cynthia Poon; Chuanxin M Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.