Literature DB >> 16307242

Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.

Leia B Bagesteiro1, Fabrice R Sarlegna, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of proprioceptive and visual information about initial limb position in controlling the distance of rapid, single-joint reaching movements. Using a virtual reality environment, we systematically changed the relationship between actual and visually displayed hand position as subjects' positioned a cursor within a start circle. No visual feedback was given during the movement. Subjects reached two visual targets (115 and 125 degrees elbow angle) from four start locations (90, 95, 100, and 105 degrees elbow angle) under four mismatch conditions (0, 5, 10, or 15 degrees). A 2 x 4 x 4 ANOVA enabled us to ask whether the subjects controlled the movement distance in accord with the virtual, or the actual hand location. Our results indicate that the movement distance was mainly controlled according to the virtual start location. Whereas distance modification was most extensive for the closer target, analysis of acceleration profiles revealed that, regardless of target position, visual information about start location determined the initial peak in tangential hand acceleration. Peak acceleration scaled with peak velocity and movement distance, a phenomenon termed "pulse-height" control. In contrast, proprioceptive information about actual hand location determined the duration of acceleration, which also scaled with peak velocity and movement distance, a phenomenon termed "pulse-width" control. Because pulse-height and pulse-width mechanisms reflect movement planning and sensory-based corrective processes, respectively, our current findings indicate that vision is used primarily for planning movement distance, while proprioception is used primarily for online corrections during rapid, unseen movements toward visual targets.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307242     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0272-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Arm movements in monkeys: behavior and neurophysiology.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual-proprioceptive interaction under large amounts of conflict.

Authors:  D H Warren; W T Cleaves
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

7.  Cortical mechanisms related to the direction of two-dimensional arm movements: relations in parietal area 5 and comparison with motor cortex.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Catching a ball: contributions of intrinsic muscle stiffness, reflexes, and higher order responses.

Authors:  D J Bennett; M Gorassini; A Prochazka
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  EMG patterns in antagonist muscles during isometric contraction in man: relations to response dynamics.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments.

Authors:  C Ghez; D Vicario
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  36 in total

1.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is associated with enhanced depth perception in novices.

Authors:  S Manasnayakorn; A Cuschieri; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Overlapping representations for reach depth and direction in caudal superior parietal lobule of macaques.

Authors:  Kostas Hadjidimitrakis; Giulia Dal Bo'; Rossella Breveglieri; Claudio Galletti; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-03-25

8.  Reaching in depth: hand position dominates over binocular eye position in the rostral superior parietal lobule.

Authors:  Stefano Ferraina; Emiliano Brunamonti; Maria Assunta Giusti; Stefania Costa; Aldo Genovesio; Roberto Caminiti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Flexibility and individual differences in visuo-proprioceptive integration: evidence from the analysis of a morphokinetic control task.

Authors:  Philippe Boulinguez; Joëlle Rouhana
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Distinct and flexible rates of online control.

Authors:  John de Grosbois; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.