Literature DB >> 22188333

Dynamic dominance persists during unsupported reaching.

Tucker Tomlinson1, Robert Sainburg.   

Abstract

Previous studies examining lateralization of arm movements focused on supported movements in the horizontal plane, removing the effects of gravity. The authors hypothesized that interlimb differences in free reaching would be consistent with the differences shown during supported reaching. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected for the forearm and upper arm segments in a 3-direction reaching task. Results showed lateralization of coordination, reflected by initial movement direction and trajectory curvature. The nondominant arm showed increased initial direction errors, and path curvature associated with a timing deficit between elbow and shoulder peak torques. These coordination deficits did not disrupt final position accuracy. The authors conclude that nondominant arm coordination deficits are similar to those reported previously for horizontal plane movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22188333      PMCID: PMC3710691          DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2011.636398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  43 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Accommodation to increased accuracy demands by the right and left hands.

Authors:  J I Todor; J Cisneros
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Manual asymmetries in visually directed aiming.

Authors:  E A Roy; D Elliott
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-06

8.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position.

Authors:  E Bizzi; A Polit; P Morasso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement.

Authors:  M J Hollerbach; T Flash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Some factors pertinent to the organization and control of arm movements.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting; C A Terzuolo
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  10 in total

1.  Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns.

Authors:  Chase J Coelho; Andrzej Przybyla; Vivek Yadav; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Force fluctuations while pressing and moving against high- and low-friction touch screen surfaces.

Authors:  Mukta N Joshi; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input.

Authors:  Clarissa Beke; Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression.

Authors:  Hanna Gertz; Dimitris Voudouris; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Interlimb differences in coordination of rapid wrist/forearm movements.

Authors:  Gautum A Srinivasan; Tarika Embar; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Bilateral Synergy: A Framework for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Rl Sainburg; D Good; A Przybyla
Journal:  J Neurol Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23

7.  Handedness results from complementary hemispheric dominance, not global hemispheric dominance: evidence from mechanically coupled bilateral movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Woytowicz; Kelly P Westlake; Jill Whitall; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

9.  On the Role of Physical Interaction on Performance of Object Manipulation by Dyads.

Authors:  Keivan Mojtahedi; Qiushi Fu; Marco Santello
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Similarities in the neural control of the shoulder and elbow joints belie their structural differences.

Authors:  Andrew R Karduna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.