Literature DB >> 15549248

[Hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

W-C Witzleb1, A Knecht, T Beichler, T Köhler, K-P Günther.   

Abstract

In comparison to stemmed total hip replacements, hip resurfacing offers advantages especially in joint stability and amount of femoral bone resection. After the poor results achieved with this concept that were mainly caused by failure of the materials used, reintroduction of the metal-on-metal bearing initiated a renaissance. This bearing, the cementless cup, and the improved surgical technique led to better short- to medium-term results. Revision and complication rates are now comparable to conventional total hip replacements. The functional capacity of the method is higher. Because long-term results are not available, however, questions remain, for instance, the consequences of the higher metal ion serum concentrations or the impossibility of changing the inlay when femoral revision becomes necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549248     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-004-0718-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  31 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the wear and wear debris from low and high carbon content cobalt chrome alloys used in metal on metal total hip replacements.

Authors:  J L Tipper; P J Firkins; E Ingham; J Fisher; M H Stone; R Farrar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Increased blood cobalt and chromium after total hip replacement.

Authors:  A W Schaffer; A Pilger; C Engelhardt; K Zweymueller; H W Ruediger
Journal:  J Toxicol Clin Toxicol       Date:  1999

3.  Preliminary results of uncemented metal on metal stemmed and resurfacing hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Wagner; H Wagner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Simple varus intertrochanteric osteotomy.

Authors:  H Ito; K Kaneda; T Matsuno
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-11

5.  Drug-induced arthropathy and necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  L Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1973-05

6.  Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis.

Authors:  D McMinn; R Treacy; K Lin; P Pynsent
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S Bell; J Schatzker; V L Fornasier; S B Goodman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  ICLH surface replacement of the hip. An analysis of the first 10 years.

Authors:  M A Freeman; G W Bradley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1983-08

10.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Daniel; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  [Cementless stems of the hip. Current status].

Authors:  H Effenberger; M Imhof; U Witzel; S Rehart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [The femoral neck prosthesis CUT. Three- to six-year results].

Authors:  S A Ender; A Machner; G Pap; H Grasshoff; H W Neumann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Dislocation as a rare complication of resurfacing of the hip joint. Case report and meta-analysis].

Authors:  S Lieske; M John; C Rimasch; K Mahlfeld
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Femoral neck prostheses].

Authors:  C Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.