Literature DB >> 6409905

ICLH surface replacement of the hip. An analysis of the first 10 years.

M A Freeman, G W Bradley.   

Abstract

Clinical experience of the ICLH method of resurfacing the hip now spans 10 years. The first 36 arthroplasties, performed between 1972 and 1974, have been previously reported. This review covers in detail 204 such arthroplasties performed between 1975 and 1979 using a standard operative technique and prosthesis; these hips were consecutive and entirely unselected. Follow-up averaged 3.2 years (range two to six years). Successful hips are comparable to hips successfully replaced with stemmed prostheses. The rates of perioperative complications and failure due to infection, ectopic ossification, fracture of the femoral neck, and dislocation are favourably comparable to rates reported for stemmed total hip arthroplasties. The rate of aseptic loosening (17 per cent) greatly exceeded that found for stemmed total hip arthroplasties. Errors of patient selection, operative technique and prosthetic design have been identified. It is concluded that, although resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip may be an appealing procedure with theoretical advantages in certain instances, patient selection is essential, operative technique is demanding and changes in the design of the prosthesis are required. The procedure is still in evolution and therefore it should not yet be generally employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6409905     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.65B4.6409905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  11 in total

1.  [Hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  W-C Witzleb; A Knecht; T Beichler; T Köhler; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Hip implant evaluation in an arthritic animal model.

Authors:  T W Phillips; K R Gurr; D R Rao
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  [Complications of metal-on-metal tribological pairing].

Authors:  M Stiehler; F Zobel; F Hannemann; J Schmitt; J Lützner; S Kirschner; K-P Günther; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Mechanical failure in double cup arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  D Hernandez-Vaquero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Total hip replacement with Müller prosthesis and ICLH double cup. 2- to 6-year results of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  A Reigstad; M Brandt; K R Hetland
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986

6.  A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis.

Authors:  M C de Waal Malefijt; R Huiskes
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Rearthroplasty after conventional total hip prosthesis and double-cup prosthesis. A comparative study.

Authors:  A Reigstad; K R Hetland
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984

Review 8.  Heterotopic ossifications following implant surgery--epidemiology, therapeutical approaches and current concepts.

Authors:  Christian Zeckey; Frank Hildebrand; Michael Frink; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 9.623

9.  Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Christine M Pui; Matthew J Ludeman; Thomas P Vail; Marc D Silverstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty of the canine hip.

Authors:  J Schatzker; S B Goodman; G Sumner-Smith; V L Fornasier; N Goften; R S Bell
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.