Literature DB >> 17396244

[Femoral neck prostheses].

C Stukenborg-Colsman1.   

Abstract

The survival rates of cementless femoral neck prostheses are lower than for cementless standard stems. Nevertheless, femoral neck prostheses have the advantage of preserving the femoral neck as well as not opening the diaphyseal marrow cavity. Should the need to change the endoprosthesis arise, a standard stem anchored in the diaphysis can be implanted after resection of the femoral neck. Since there is a relationship between surgical error and the learning curve for a new implant, the surgeon should be experienced in the field of total hip arthroplasty. In addition, the implantation of femoral neck prostheses is technically demanding. Therefore, careful patient selection is necessary and patients have to be informed of the advantages as well as the disadvantages of the different implant models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17396244     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1070-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  18 in total

1.  [Radiological analysis of the thrust plate prosthesis (TPP)].

Authors:  B A Ishaque; S Wienbeck; E Basad; H Stürz
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

2.  [Midterm results and revisions of the thrust plate prosthesis (TPP)].

Authors:  B A Ishaque; S Wienbeck; H Stürz
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

3.  [ESKA (CUT) endoprosthesis].

Authors:  W Thomas; L Lucente; N Mantegna; H Grundei
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [The femoral neck prosthesis CUT. Three- to six-year results].

Authors:  S A Ender; A Machner; G Pap; H Grasshoff; H W Neumann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Long-term results with the cement-free Spotorno CLS shaft].

Authors:  R Siebold; G Scheller; U Schreiner; L Jani
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Long-term results of Judet's cementless total endoprosthesis of the hip joint].

Authors:  D Bettin; B Greitemann; J Polster; S Schulte-Eistrup
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec

7.  Long-term results with the uncemented thrust plate prosthesis (TPP).

Authors:  A H Huggler; H A Jacob; H Bereiter; M Haferkorn; C Ryf; R Schenk
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.500

8.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study.

Authors:  B F Morrey; R A Adams; M Kessler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

9.  Survival analysis of cementless grit-blasted titanium total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  C Delaunay; A I Kapandji
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

10.  Hip arthroplasty using the cementless CLS stem. A 2--4-year experience.

Authors:  R P Robinson; T P Lovell; T M Green
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short stem prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Michael Schneider; Nicole Bogner; Nadine Botha; Matthias Gebauer; Thorsten Gehrke; Bernd Schwantes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Periprosthetic femoral bone reaction after total hip arthroplasty with preservation of the collum femoris : CT-assisted osteodensitometry 1 and 3 years postoperatively].

Authors:  R Schmidt; S Gollwitzer; T E Nowak; M Nowak; L Häberle; A Kress; R Forst; L A Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Clinical results of the metha short hip stem: a perspective for younger patients?

Authors:  Fritz Thorey; Claudia Hoefer; Nima Abdi-Tabari; Matthias Lerch; Stefan Budde; Henning Windhagen
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-11-06

5.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with the NANOS neck preserving hip stem: a 10 to 16-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Santis; Nadia Bonfiglio; Mattia Basilico; Greta Tanzi Germani; Maria Rosaria Matrangolo; Angelo Carosini; Giuseppe Malerba; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  5-year clinical and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) follow-up of 39 CUT femoral neck total hip prostheses in young osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis--a prospective 5 year follow-up.

Authors:  Wolfram Steens; Friedrich Boettner; Rainer Bader; Ralf Skripitz; Alberto Schneeberger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.